| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| View Poll Results: Who should replace Liz? | ||||||
| Boris |
|
7 | 30.43% | |||
|
||||||
| Rishi |
|
7 | 30.43% | |||
|
||||||
| Penny |
|
1 | 4.35% | |||
|
||||||
| Other |
|
8 | 34.78% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
GoldHeart
|
That's why the conservatives won't want an election.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
AnnieK
|
Agreed. I don't think Starmer is a strong leader....but people are now so sick of the Tories Labour will win by a landslide if there was election tomorrow, regardless of their leader.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
100% this.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
GoldHeart
|
The conservatives are in such a dreadful state , that the public would probably rather take their chances with a ventriloquist dummy. So of course Starmer would do well if there was a general election now .But i agree he's not a strong leader, and i'm not a fan of his .
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
no, not anything, the economy is not going to improve, times are going to be tough. If you look at any party in power over the last 40 years, during bad economic times, they are out at the next election.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
|||
|
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
I've set out to work for and campaign for a Labour win since the 2015 election. I don't care what it may be. Labour as easily largest party with either Lib Dem support or SNP just NOT willing to bring Labour down to risk the Cons back in. My preference would be a comfortable 30 to 40 overall majority. I don't really like massive landslide wins as majorities with far less than 50% of votes cast. As I've said, I don't believe these extremely high leads for Labour plus I KNOW a lot of support is not FOR Starmer's Labour but much more against any recent or new Con leader's Cons. It is true as you stated, a government presiding over economic problems/ chaos 2 to 3 years from an election usually gets punished whenever the next election comes. I hope you are right and I'll be one of the first to point out you were when this lot get hopefully absolutely turfed out. No matter the time the Cons now force the electorate to have to wait for in order to get their say on this shambolic mess. Last edited by joeysteele; 22-10-2022 at 03:45 PM. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|