[Alf]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Anybody can be racist, it would be uneducated for anybody to say otherwise.

However having a Charity dedicated to certain communities isn't prejudiced imo, otherwise there's a lot of prejudice within Children In Need and Comic Relief then.

Not really, Children in need and Comic relief are said to help out many communities, it's not ever been said it discriminates based on the colour of one's skin (although they're both probably scams that give out a few quid here and there to give the impression that they're not scams)

Her charity apparently discriminates based on skin colour. I don't know if that's true, but that's the assumption we get.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Alf

Not really, Children in need and Comic relief are said to help out many communities, it's not ever been said it discriminates based on the colour of one's skin (although they're both probably scams that give out a few quid here and there to give the impression that they're not scams)

Her charity apparently discriminates based on skin colour. I don't know if that's true, but that's the assumption we get.

Children In Need helps out children in the UK, to some people they could argue that it's discrimination because it's only one country being helped, or the fact that it's called Children In Need and not All In Need so that they could then help out adults as well as kids.

Obviously I'm playing devil's advocate here, I honestly don't care who Children In Need helps, or this woman's Charity as long as they're helping decent people improve their lives.

[bots]

it's not discrimination for a fund raiser to only help out the country where the money is raised, nor is it discriminatory to target the African continent.

It is discriminatory for a charity that is focussed on abused women, to turn away white women