[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Daily Mail
“Speaking of: have you heard about Harry's latest money-grubbing scheme? It's a live online chat about all his traumas. Can't imagine he's got anything new to say — how to top tales of a frostbitten penis and sex next to a box of his dead mother's hair? — but for the low, low price of $33.99, you can log on to a livestream chat and ask your own questions of Harry this Saturday at noon eastern.
Of course, there's a caveat — what, did you expect something straightforward here? Comments will be disabled and there will be no live questions taken. Our prince will be fielding only pre-submitted and pre-approved queries.”

The Victimisation Tour continues….

Oh dear....so he cant even to a 'livestream' chat without it being a complete farce....

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Cherie

If you rent perfectly habitable house, but choose to redecorate to your own taste, the landlord does not have to pay for this when you move out, it was their choice to refurbish

Exactly...

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

Daily Mail
“Speaking of: have you heard about Harry's latest money-grubbing scheme? It's a live online chat about all his traumas. Can't imagine he's got anything new to say — how to top tales of a frostbitten penis and sex next to a box of his dead mother's hair? — but for the low, low price of $33.99, you can log on to a livestream chat and ask your own questions of Harry this Saturday at noon eastern.
Of course, there's a caveat — what, did you expect something straightforward here? Comments will be disabled and there will be no live questions taken. Our prince will be fielding only pre-submitted and pre-approved queries.”

The Victimisation Tour continues….

Omg didn't know about this thanks for promoting it

[GoldHeart]

Live chat stream $33.99???!

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Live chat stream $33.99???!

fools and their money eh?

[arista]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Live chat stream $33.99???!

Yes,they need every possible income

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Cherie

fools and their money eh?

Yep
I wouldn't even pay 1p

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Andrews current home has 31 bedrooms ffs

and he is complaining at having to slum it in frogmore which has 10 bedrooms

and people have sympathy for this shower?

Yes he is lucky Frogmore
is available for him.


One Pervert does not need 31 Rooms

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Omg didn't know about this thanks for promoting it

You are very welcome - they do need the support as their popularity is crashing.....and you'll get a free WAAAGH book, how exciting for you!!!

https://www.news.com.au/entertainmen...41821df9587b0c
The 38-year-old will be joined in conversation with Dr Gabriel Maté to discuss “living with loss and the importance of personal healing,” according to the website, and that entry fee includes a copy of Spare.
In case anyone doesn’t have their pocket calculator to hand, that’s a $1,479,966 drop in how much it costs to hear from the horsey HRH’s mouth in only 36 months. If ever there was a way of illustrating just how much things have changed since those heady first weeks, post-Megxit, when it looked like Harry and wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex had the world at their feet and the royal family on the ropes, then this is it.
If there is one thing that Harry has proven this year it is that familiarity breeds both contempt and low price points.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yep
I wouldn't even pay 1p

They would have to pay me...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

You are very welcome - they do need the support as their popularity is crashing.....and you'll get a free WAAAGH book, how exciting for you!!!

https://www.news.com.au/entertainmen...41821df9587b0c
The 38-year-old will be joined in conversation with Dr Gabriel Maté to discuss “living with loss and the importance of personal healing,” according to the website, and that entry fee includes a copy of Spare.
In case anyone doesn’t have their pocket calculator to hand, that’s a $1,479,966 drop in how much it costs to hear from the horsey HRH’s mouth in only 36 months. If ever there was a way of illustrating just how much things have changed since those heady first weeks, post-Megxit, when it looked like Harry and wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex had the world at their feet and the royal family on the ropes, then this is it.
If there is one thing that Harry has proven this year it is that familiarity breeds both contempt and low price points.

[user104658]

Interest in the Royals in general has waned since Her Maj died, wouldn't you say, Jet? There's a notable change in tone. The Press isn't as charitable with Charles as they always have been with Liz and people aren't really interested in him either... and the "fresh new face" of the monarchy in William and Kate looks more tired, bald and boring by the day. It's light out at Buckingham Palace for the lot of them soon enough I reckon, which was fairly predictable.

And yes that applies to H&M too. The book era was fun, but on the whole, none of it is really very interesting now that the Last Proper Royal is gone. She was a part of history - what's left is just tiddlers nibbling at scraps.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Interest in the Royals in general has waned since Her Maj died, wouldn't you say, Jet? There's a notable change in tone. The Press isn't as charitable with Charles as they always have been with Liz and people aren't really interested in him either... and the "fresh new face" of the monarchy in William and Kate looks more tired, bald and boring by the day. It's light out at Buckingham Palace for the lot of them soon enough I reckon, which was fairly predictable.

And yes that applies to H&M too. The book era was fun, but on the whole, none of it is really very interesting now that the Last Proper Royal is gone. She was a part of history - what's left is just tiddlers nibbling at scraps.

I agree with this, Liz might have had her faults but you knew where you stood with her and she was someone to be trusted to the end....not sure you can say that about any of this lot, time will tell with William and Kate, but Charles and Camilla just dont garner the same affection as Liz

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I agree with this, Liz might have had her faults but you knew where you stood with her and she was someone to be trusted to the end....not sure you can say that about any of this lot, time will tell with William and Kate, but Charles and Camilla just dont garner the same affection as Liz

My recent impressions of William are that he's becoming a bit more jaded, frustrated and... well... Charles-like as he gets towards middle-age. It may well partly be Harry's "fault" too, certainly... it's unlikely that the rift hasn't taken a toll.

But overall he's lost that youthful vibrancy and optimism that made them seem like something new... they just feel like more of the same now.

[rusticgal]

I think given time they will come into their own….to have had 70 years with our Queen change is going to take time to adjust to.

[GoldHeart]

Even a BLM activist has turned her back on them , she clearly didn't want to look silly defending them. As now she's saying Harry & Meghan have "contradicted themselves" lol .

[Liam-]

Shame on Charles, defying his poor mothers wishes after she’s died, completely disrespectful to her memory

[Swan]

New Episode tonight at 10pm
(nothing to do with H/M, just saying)

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Shame on Charles, defying his poor mothers wishes after she’s died, completely disrespectful to her memory

How has he done that??

[jet]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

My recent impressions of William are that he's becoming a bit more jaded, frustrated and... well... Charles-like as he gets towards middle-age. It may well partly be Harry's "fault" too, certainly... it's unlikely that the rift hasn't taken a toll.

But overall he's lost that youthful vibrancy and optimism that made them seem like something new... they just feel like more of the same now.

Youthful vibrancy? he’s now a grown man in his forties who, in public, carries out his duties and responsibilities with social aplomb, dignity and maturity as befits a Prince of Wales and future King.
He’s not going to go on talk shows and talk about his penis to keep those who prefer that kind of thing entertained.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Shame on Charles, defying his poor mothers wishes after she’s died, completely disrespectful to her memory

I didn't see you being concerned for his poor mother when Harry and Meghan were causing all sorts of trouble to the family and to the institution she devoted her whole life to. Especially when her beloved husband was on his deathbed and then when she herself was dying. Shame on them.

[Cherie]

Prince Andrew may be forced to leave the Royal Lodge on the Windsor Estate if King Charles III cuts his royal allowance. A new Express.co.uk poll has found three-quarters of readers support the Duke of York being evicted from his Ł30million home.

Andrew stepped back from public life as a senior working royal four years ago and has since been dependent upon his annual allowance of Ł249,000. The King is expected to make a series of cuts to royal spending next month, including his brother's allowance.


This means that he may no longer be able to afford the upkeep and running costs of the Royal Lodge. The King has reportedly offered his brother Frogmore Cottage on the grounds of the Windsor Estate. The property is the former UK residence of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The couple were issued with an eviction notice by Buckingham Palace, in January, after the publication of Harry's tell-all memoir, Spare.

A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirmed on Wednesday evening that they have been "requested to vacate" Frogmore Cottage".

Andrew is said to be "resisting the idea" of moving to the smaller property. An insider told The Sun: "This eviction surely spells the end of Harry and Meghan's time in the UK. Andrew is resisting the idea of moving into Frogmore Cottage after he was offered it last week. But it shows Harry and Meghan are powerless to stop the eviction."

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...c34b836a&ei=11

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Shame on Charles, defying his poor mothers wishes after she’s died, completely disrespectful to her memory

Liz was aware that Charles was going to have a slimmed down monarchy when he took over, its been a matter of public record for years

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Liz was aware that Charles was going to have a slimmed down monarchy when he took over, its been a matter of public record for years

Yes Cherie....and Charles is making positive steps by slimming down the Monarchy...kicking his own brother out of his residence and putting him in a 'smaller' one.
If Meghan and Harry visit there is plenty of room in Windsor Castle for them to stay...
He is doing a great job...his mother would be proud.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

Youthful vibrancy? he’s now a grown man in his forties who, in public, carries out his duties and responsibilities with social aplomb, dignity and maturity as befits a Prince of Wales and future King.

Yes Jet but far fewer people are interested in any of that in 2023 than in 1953 - hence my point. If they were different to what came before then there could have been a modernisation of the monarchy that might keep the general public - who are not staunch royalists like yourself - somewhat interested and thus keep the monarchy relevant. And it looked like William and Kate might be those people. But now he looks like someone who fits the mould, more of the same, and it's not going to be as popular. It just isn't. The queen had the benefit of being for want of a better phrase, "part of the furniture" of Britain. Fewer and fewer people are going to maintain an interest int he traditional monarchy now. It's already happening and she's barely cold.