[bots]

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get

[bots]

Originally Posted by Cherie

whats the deal with the NDA coming to an end, I thought those things were forever?

it depends. They don't just hand them out without there being some terms attached. A time limit may have been put on it if their justification was time based

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Well she was the closest to him .

Hence why she may/will feel more aggrieved that many others ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

As far as I know, NDAs don't cover crimes?

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get

So does that stand for all the rock bands , pop singers and Rap artists over the last 60 years ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

if Holly didn't know what was going on she is the most naive tv presenter out there at the moment. Personally, i think she kept her mouth shut as the show was her golden egg and she only started to show discontent when family/friends started asking her serious questions

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

So does that stand for all the rock bands , pop singers and Rap artists over the last 60 years ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

of course it does and if you look in the news you will see a lot of high profile rock stars and celebs are getting their just rewards now

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Still no evidence anything happened before he was 18 and he hasn’t been accused of anything either, aside from Internet weirdos obvs

Funny that - I've also only seen "internet weirdos" trying to argue that noncery-with-a-loophole is all A-OK. (prep 'em young then wait for them to "come of age" before pulling the trigger - legal!)

Most actual people in the real world recognise that 50 year old men befriending 10 year olds and then ****ing them in their late teens is an absolute shambles.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

his wife divorced him didn't she?

No idea Bots,as i say im not too well up on it.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

No wife and kids are accepting of a man in his 50s shagging a 16 year old boy that he groomed from age 10

having sex with a kid that is 6 years younger than his youngest daughter

Was he shagging him ? I didnt know that,and LT youde be surprisd what some women would put up with.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Schofield has the potential to be Saville mark 2, that's why it's important. Anyone that uses their celebrity status and power to groom young kids deserves all they get

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with?

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

of course it does and if you look in the news you will see a lot of high profile rock stars and celebs are getting their just rewards now

Bill Wyman ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Originally Posted by Liam-

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with?

i'm glad it amuses you so much, a bit sick for my taste but each to their own

[Liam-]

I’m laughing at the absurdity of your ridiculous statement

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Liam-

I’m laughing at the absurdity of your ridiculous statement

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

All made up in your own perverted head.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

All made up in your own perverted head.

Its simps like you that turn a blind eye because the subject is to shocking that facilitate this.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You are ok with this old pervert perving over a child for years, using his power and influence during those years to further the childs carear in the tv industry because he had fallen in love with him. Become obsessed enough by him at his tender age of 10, that he followed and groomed him enough to have a sexual relationship with him in later years....I find that ridiculous

Great Post Parm. You've expressed just how I feel too.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Liam-

There’s not even any evidence that he abused this one person people are trying to pin him with, yet you think this is a reasonable thing to come out with?

Originally Posted by Glenn.

All made up in your own perverted head.

There is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. Then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

[arista]

Once one Press Group
pays the lad
the shocking truth will
be out.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by arista

Once one Press Group
pays the lad
the shocking truth will
be out.

Maybe as soon as tomorrow

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Kate!

There is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. Then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

Exactly

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by kate!

there is evidence that he groomed him from the age of 15 if not earlier. Sick.

Let's give you two a hypothetical situation. You have a son aged 15 and a 50 plus man is taking an interest in him. then as soon as he turns 18 this man starts sleeping with him. And all he can say in defence is that its bloody legal. You'd be happy with that would you? I doubt it.

Must have killed him to have to wait a few years so he could parrot this crap excuse of it's legal and consensual. He groomed him. No smoke without fire.

no, as soon as he turns 16...

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Maybe as soon as tomorrow

Sadly
Not Yet.

[Vanessa]

There are pictures of them leaving a hotel. And the lad was 15 at the time.
It's illegal and quite frankly disgusting. He was a child.
Would you be happy with it if it was your own child? Don't think so.