[Parmy]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

GBN news with the infamous Dan Wootten been covering the story since 9pm with an interview with Eamonn Holmes on in a few minutes…

They should be interviewing the whistleblower......RUTH.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Andrew actually sexually assaulted a woman did he not?

did he?

Well there was an allegation which cost the Queen £12m…

An allegation one more than in this case. To compare them is ridiculous

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Well there was an allegation which cost the Queen £12m…

An allegation one more than in this case. To compare them is ridiculous

I wonder how much Phillip's NDA cost.

[UserSince2005]

If you don’t think Phil groomed that child
Then you think that child prostituted himself for free meals and a job.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

If you don’t think Phil groomed that child
Then you think that child prostituted himself for free meals and a job.

The guy spent years in the groom cupboard fgs.

[Kate!]

Glenn is blind, must be. Or selectively so. Why the Phillip bias him and Liam have?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Andrew actually sexually assaulted a woman did he not? As there has been no mention of sexual assault and contrary to everyone’s opinions, Phil had a consensual relationship. Do I agree that he cheated on his wife and lied, No. do I believe he groomed him because he had ulterior motives, also no.

No, he had at the time seemingly "consensual" sex with a 17 year old girl who had been groomed/sex trafficked into coming to Epstein sex parties.

I guess Andrew must be off the hook now... She can't have been groomed, she was of legal age!

[bots]

People that think what Phillip has done is ok must have direct experience where they are someone they know has done exactly the same thing and therefore think it's normal

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Glenn's stance is that it's OK to plant seeds in young lads so long as you wait until the fruit is ripe before you stick your cock in it. It's legal arista. Legal.

Tbf to Glenn there have been people on the Internet accusing Phillip Schofield of being a Paedophile, which I think Glenn is objecting to, which I can understand.

Personally though I do think that Phillip's relationship with the teen should be thoroughly investigated, just to put it to rest once and for all on if he is an out and out Nonce, or if he has blurred the lines, but isn't technically doing anything illegal.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Glenn is blind, must be. Or selectively so. Why the Phillip bias him and Liam have?

Yes Gays protect
other gays.

Problem is though, Kate
Phillip Schofield is a Paedophile

The Clock is Ticking...........

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Can you IMAGINE the reaction if Piers Morgan had met a 10 year old through ITV, slid into her DM's at 15 and started a sexual relationship with her at 16-18?

Please Liam and Glenn, please try to argue that you'd take a "wait and see if he broke the law before judging" approach if that was the situation.

I think it's fairly obvious that you'd be all over it as soon as there was a sniff of inappropriate behaviour.

You both PROVABLY have no problem calling out Prince Andrew for his actions with teenage girls.

Why are you picking up the shields and going on the march for Philip?

Prince Andrew was (and I still think) is friends with Paedophiles, no wonder people are suspicious about him tbf.

I do agree with you about Piers Morgan though, I think nearly everyone would be thinking it's true if someone were to accuse him of being a Nonce, because not that many people like Piers Morgan.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Tbf to Glenn there have been people on the Internet accusing Phillip Schofield of being a Paedophile, which I think Glenn is objecting to, which I can understand.

Personally though I do think that Phillip's relationship with the teen should be thoroughly investigated, just to put it to rest once and for all on if he is an out and out Nonce, or if he has blurred the lines, but isn't technically doing anything illegal.

He's objecting to those of us who do think Schofield is a groomer and a nonce. Says we've nothing to go on. Why then did both Schofield and Matthew lie their heads off to cover it all up?

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes Gays protect
other gays.

Problem is though, Kate
Phillip Schofield is a Paedophile

The Clock is Ticking...........

Yes Arista.

How about we say we want to protect the likes of Matthew McGreevy, a young impressionable kid who was star struck that his idol got him a job without realising he was just doing it for his own ends so to speak.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

And, the 'People are out to get me' that posted on Insta was completely tone deaf by Schofield. He deserves this cuz he's behaving very arrogantly given the circumstances

Phillip Schofield is an arrogant man imo, regardless of if he should be in jail or not.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Kate!

He's objecting to those of us who do think Schofield is a groomer and a nonce. Says we've nothing to go on. Why then did both Schofield and Matthew lie their heads off to cover it all up?

I'm also suspicious of Schofield for a few different reasons.

But tbf Glenn is right that it's speculation based on circumstantial evidence rather than out and out proof that he is a Nonce.

And I don't know if he meets the definition of a Groomer, so I'll leave that to the intellectuals.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I'm also suspicious of Schofield for a few different reasons.

But tbf Glenn is right that it's speculation based on circumstantial evidence rather than out and out proof that he is a Nonce.

And I don't know if he meets the definition of a Groomer, so I'll leave that to the intellectuals.

But how is it circumstantial? Glenn's just playing devil's advocate and harping on it ad nauseum. Will he eat his words when the truth comes out?

The FACTS!

Phillip took an interest in Matthew from the age of 10. Got him a job. People have attested that they were a couple.

Matthew posted on social media that he was hurt, and he'd thought him and Schofield were forever.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Kate!

But how is it circumstantial? Glenn's just playing devil's advocate and harping on it ad nauseum. Will he eat his words when the truth comes out?

The FACTS!

Phillip took an interest in Matthew from the age of 10. Got him a job. People have attested that they were a couple.

Matthew posted on social media that he was hurt, and he'd thought him and Schofield were forever.

Legally speaking we know that Phillip knew him when he was 10, but had sex with him when he was 16 if I'm not mistaken.

Basically if the Police were to start investigating this case, they would need to find evidence of Phillip having sexual relations with the guy before he turned 16, because until then all any of us can do is speculate.

Personally I'm suspicious of Phillip, and I do think that it's weird that he had a sexual relationship with someone that he knew when he was a kid, but I know that my opinion isn't evidence to get Phillip arrested or sentenced.

[Josiah.]

Can a mod or James close this thread? This is getting out of hand…

[Kate!]

Noooo Josiah. Why? We need a thread to discuss this.

Is it because we are disagreeing or because you don't like what is being said about Phillip?

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Legally speaking we know that Phillip knew him when he was 10, but had sex with him when he was 16 if I'm not mistaken.

Basically if the Police were to start investigating this case, they would need to find evidence of Phillip having sexual relations with the guy before he turned 16, because until then all any of us can do is speculate.

Personally I'm suspicious of Phillip, and I do think that it's weird that he had a sexual relationship with someone that he knew when he was a kid, but I know that my opinion isn't evidence to get Phillip arrested or sentenced.

I have no time for Schofield and think he's arrogant in a bad way.
I can't stand him as a presenter nor two faced Holly Willoughby either.
They made a perfect as to BAD team for me.

I do however agree with all you've said in your recent posts on this thread on this issue.

Really the only way to gather the whole truth on this is for it to be legally or properly investigated.
On which again I agree with you.

I'll only add there are very unsavoury elements it seems on the surface as to this relationship.
Which maybe only the younger guy can shed more light on.

[Gusto Brunt]

I think Schofield is right what he says about people like Eamonn Holmes, they are bitter.

Holmes is obviously bitter he was axed from This Morning and he blames Schofield for weilding enough power to get rid of him.

But Holmes - I've always liked him - but hush, man. You're coming across as vindictive and bitter. Not nice.

[Zizu]

Holmes is obviously hoping to come out of this looking better than he currently is and that the public will rally round and get him and his wife on the show in place of Holly and Schofield


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Holmes has always been an obnoxious git

[arista]

Originally Posted by Josiah.

Can a mod or James close this thread? This is getting out of hand…

Hang on,
loads more Front Pages to post
That is like a History Document for a Media Student
Josiah

[arista]