FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
First Heading:
New word being used "Terf" for some women who are Hostile to Trans ![]() [A person whose views on gender identity are considered hostile to transgender people, or who opposes social and political policies designed to be inclusive of transgender people. "they accused the protester of being a TERF and transphobic"] [TERF is an acronym for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. First recorded in 2008, the term was originally used to distinguish transgender-inclusive feminists from a group of radical feminists and social conservatives who reject the assertion that trans women are women, including trans women in women's spaces, and transgender rights legislation.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERF Ref: (Terf) Was used in Headliners, One Hour Newspaper Review the past few days. 11PM Every Night GBnewsHD ![]() This above Cartoon was shown. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/o...-b1085997.html Last edited by arista; 07-06-2023 at 07:27 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Often they're not even radical feminists.
Just no. One doesn't have to be any shade of conservative or feminist to acknowledge the truth. TERF is just a bs term coined to reject views that go against trans ideology.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
terf has been around for years
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Yes Arista, where have you been?
![]() That cartoon picture at the end is from an Oxfam pride ad campaign though which they removed and apologised for not long after they put it up, for using that misogynistic slur and for the likeness people where pointing out to JK Rowling.
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Sure, it was used the last couple of days No harm is breaking the word down, I say and that cartoon upset some. Last edited by arista; 07-06-2023 at 07:05 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Arista, someone called me a terf on this forum 6 years ago
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() [This picture of JK Rowling at the Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald premiere in Paris in 2018 appears to be very similar to the cartoon woman depicted] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...K-Rowling.html |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Drink the Kool Aid
|
Last edited by Crimson Dynamo; 07-06-2023 at 07:30 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Better Title Now
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
oxfam have such a stellar reputation too
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Schrödinger's Quato
|
The thing is, "TERF" is quite descriptive and not necessarily offensive
![]() Oliver is correct though in some cases it's just not accurate as there are plenty of TELFs these days as well (Trans Exclusionary Liberal Feminists). I imagine trans rights activists would like to believe that's not the case, though. But all "radical" actually means is acknowledging the existence of patriarchal values in society and through history. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
I've seen a comparison made to an anti suffragette propaganda poster from years ago.......
![]()
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Schrödinger's Quato
|
Quote:
Its a bit of a moot term in the first place I find - it's not really feasible to be an "RF" without being "TE" ![]() That of course doesn't have to mean "wanting to eradicate trans people" - just accepting that being trans (a person of one gender choosing to present aesthetically and socially as the other gender) is not the same as actually being that gender, and is a separate category in itself. Or in short... that transwomen are transwomen (and that's entirely their choice and business), but not women... ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Oxfam have put people off donating already , keep it up ! i'll never donate to them again ~ decided that ages ago.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Watchdog considers action over Oxfam cartoon of anti-trans ‘hate groups’
Oxfam International apologised and re-edited cartoon alleged to include racial stereotyping and JK Rowling attack The UK charities watchdog is assessing whether it will take action against Oxfam after receiving complaints about a cartoon published by the charity that ignited a row about transgender issues. Oxfam International put the cartoon out on Twitter last week to mark pride month, but took it down on Tuesday after a backlash against its use of the term Terf (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) in an image depicting anti-trans “hate groups”. Oxfam International, which commissioned the cartoon as part of its gender justice campaign strand, subsequently published a re-edited version. It apologised for the “offence it caused” and said it had “made a mistake”. The cartoon had sparked a furore, with critics saying it was misogynist and used racial stereotyping. Some accused it of using an image resembling the bestselling author JK Rowling, a high-profile participant in the volatile and polarised debate around transgender issues. Writing in the Daily Mail, the journalist and feminist Julie Bindel called the cartoon a “vile and misogynist” attack on Rowling, adding that she believed Oxfam had become “captured to such an extent by extreme political ideology and trans-lunacy that it is no longer fit for purpose”. The Charity Commission said it was assessing the complaints in the context of its regulatory and risk framework, which requires it to take action if it considers a charity has undermined public trust and confidence in the charity sector. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ities-watchdog
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
i have no idea why oxfam are still permitted charity status and I have even less idea why anyone would donate to them
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Well there is surf & terf.
![]() Seriously though, I can't take Oxfam trying to be righteous very seriously given their history.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|