[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Well the Mum has tried to get them to answer who know she might have involved the whiter than white not Met as well and when she hit a brick wall took it to the Sun like any parent would if the employee is on Tv after she reported him

The police have to investigate allegations so I don’t believe the family went to the police first

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

The police have to investigate allegations so I don’t believe the family went to the police first

it doesnt matter who they went to, its their call, I wouldnt trust the police either to do anything tbh not after recent events ....and historically like Saville and Rochdale where it was all swept aside by powerful people, not sure why you and Liam are victim blaming the mother in all this, she had done what she thought was right who is anyone to question that, we are not in her shoes and dont know her previous history with the police or otherwise

[user104658]

... ... ... ... ... ... I think the truth of the matter is likely that the 17 year old involved was probably already a drug addict unrelated to this, and was providing the pictures to fund their drug habit.

And with that in mind - to be frank - no I wouldn't be surprised if the parents of an already-drug-addicted 17 year old aren't telling the whole story and have ulterior motives.

In terms of whichever presenter is involved all of that is largely irrelevant - funding a child's drug habit by buying underage pornography of them is both illegal and morally abhorrent. Really just bottom-of-the-barrel low.

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

it doesnt matter who they went to, its their call, I wouldnt trust the police either to do anything tbh not after recent events ....and historically like Saville and Rochdale where it was all swept aside by powerful people, not sure why you and Liam are victim blaming the mother in all this, she had done what she thought was right who is anyone to question that, we are not in her shoes and dont know her previous history with the police or otherwise

I’m not victim blaming so you can drop that for a start

Your happy to pull names out of a hat on who it could be

I like hard facts and professionals not the internet detectives, the same idiots that went down to the spot were Nichola bully drowned in the river

The met police are not perfect by any means and that’s because it’s human beings in uniforms at the end of the day, but without the police the world would be a free for all

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

... ... ... ... ... ... I think the truth of the matter is likely that the 17 year old involved was probably already a drug addict unrelated to this, and was providing the pictures to fund their drug habit.

And with that in mind - to be frank - no I wouldn't be surprised if the parents of an already-drug-addicted 17 year old aren't telling the whole story and have ulterior motives.

In terms of whichever presenter is involved all of that is largely irrelevant - funding a child's drug habit by buying underage pornography of them is both illegal and morally abhorrent. Really just bottom-of-the-barrel low.

We don’t know if the presenter knew the 17 year old was supporting a drug habit with the money we also don’t know if the presenter knew their real age

So it’s all speculation .

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by LaLaLand

If who I'm seeing over and over again mentioned on socials is who it is, colour me absolutely gobsmacked because they're the last person I'd have thought would be caught up in something like this. Wow!

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

[LaLaLand]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

Nick Robinson and Graham Norton are trending

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by LaLaLand

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter.

I don't have twitter. Don't get the appeal xx

[arista]

Originally Posted by LaLaLand

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter.

Post it.


Eamon Holmes says it's a open secret
who it is?

[arista]

The Dirty Bugger BBC Presenter
phoned the home of the lad,
just last week
Asking "what have you done"


Reported on today's Sun
front page.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

I’m not victim blaming so you can drop that for a start

Your happy to pull names out of a hat on who it could be

I like hard facts and professionals not the internet detectives, the same idiots that went down to the spot were Nichola bully drowned in the river

The met police are not perfect by any means and that’s because it’s human beings in uniforms at the end of the day, but without the police the world would be a free for all

We have no other choice as the BBC are protecting the perv I said time and time again its unfair on the innocent maile pressenters who have to go public to say it is not them... you like hard facts, I have suggested a few people it might be ...whats the big deal about that exactly

We have a right to know who this person is I dont know why the BBC are protecting them and you have victim blamed saying the family should have gone to the police first that is not your call to make

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

Post it.


Eamon Holmes says it's a open secret
who it is?

Nor another open secret

[arista]

Social Media is putting his Name out,
Reports say.


Another Twitter Fella
has used the Great Film Image:

[bots]

Nick Robinson ticks all the right boxes

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Nick Robinson ticks all the right boxes

maybe