[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

While I understand it was the SNP's Opposite Day, Lammy's version was much more reasoned and thought out than the "no more fighting plz" version that the SNP excreted. They should have thanked Labour for making it more appealing!


Sure. But maybe this part of LT's post is also true:
Rather, in Hoyle fearing that he has made members 'unsafe', he admits that
MPs are intimidated by a group who will resort to violence to advance Palestinian interests

Don't want another Jo Cox or David Amess.

The SNP were going to vote FOR the Labour amendment to the SNPs motion.
The SNP rejecting the Con amendment.

That was until the Cons removed their amendment and then the Cons refused to take part in the voting.

I don't get the SNPs moaning now
I can accept they were rightly annoyed 2 amendments to their motion were permitted.

However those amendments were accepted before the debate started by all Parties and all Parties took part in the debate all through.

Then seconds before the votes were due to be taken, the Cons pulled their own amendment and refused to vote at all.

Bizarre and ridiculous.