[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

i just think that because Nathan likes politics and is interested in it that he wanted Khalid to have had views on it and Nathan wanted to know more,he did apologise (not sure what for really) and Khalid did say he would chat about it with Nathan. They seem ok to me.

But what gave Nathan a right to even go there with Khaled?, it's something really personal...it isn't just an objective political view , Khaled's family are involved. Nathan came across insensitive and prick like . And it's non of his business.

Khaled is not another Daze , he's not going to have
political debate after debate. He told Nathan if he
actually wants to talk to him about it then he can.

It seems housemates in the BB house like to complain
about other housemates, while they do nothing
themselves to improve things or communicate better . If Nathan genuinely wanted to discuss
Palestine with Khaled, why should Khaled have to
prompt him to do so? . It's sounds like a him problem rather than a Khaled problem.

Nathan loved having debates with Daze ,as he always felt like he had one up on her, and that he was in the right . He had the same arrogant behaviour when he spoke with Hanah and the general election, BP doesn't agree with a word he says...but barely contributed.

I don't think he'd feel the same with Khaled and the subject matter. And actually .... Khaled & Daze had their own little conversation about it .