Quote:
Originally Posted by Christmas Spirit
There's always inconsistencies & double standards for sure, Joe was praised in his year despite having some dance experience and he ended up winning I think?. Whilst Alexandra burke & Debbie Mcgee got grief over their previous dance background.
But as I keep saying year after year ....if people want a
dance competition with total dance virgin beginners with
zero experience, then strictly would just be full of
politicians , newsreaders & Judy Murray's , and I'm pretty sure nobody wants to see that ...as it would be boring and cringe having a line up of awful dancers. Not everyone has a fun interesting journey...they just never improve lol .
I don't know what people expect, obviously if someone is from a entertainment/ theatrical or music background...then chances are they will have some advantage.
They might aswell say Chris is at a huge disadvantage,as all the other contestants/ celebrities can see  .
|
I agree with you personally.
Being fair to Tasha and JB, without them this series would have a dreadful standard of dancing this series, especially for a top 5 round.
I'm not personally a stickler for the technically best dancer having to win the series, but I am amazed at how little some of the general public actually care about good dancing on a dancing contest.
Because in Tasha's case in particular, I'm willing to bet that she hasn't left the bottom two of the public vote for a long time now, which is nuts when you look at how some people have danced this series.
__________________
Inspector Mock, at your service.