Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W
I think it didn't fall under Prevent's "jurisdiction", as he wasn't known to have the Jihadi material, and his racism against whites wasn't apparent. They deal with radicalised people, not every who's violent.
|
…it fell under the jurisdiction of concerning actions and behaviours being reported on three occasions and the whole premise of the scheme is an attempted intervention to prevent, which didn’t happen on any of those occasion's so far as is being reported…wasn’t it the whole thing of Prevent to reinforce that it’s everyone’s ’jurisdiction’ to report any concerning behaviour that someone is displaying which may indicate an intention to harm others in any type of attack…and if something doesn’t fall under ‘one jurisdiction’ then it’s the sharing of that information to the agency/organisation and all agency/organisations involved which is something that doesn’t always happen….there is no doubt that those children were butchered in an act of terrorism and there seems no doubt also that concerning behaviours were reported before the event so there is a broken system that needs to be addressed and that needs to be answerable to those parents…