[arista]

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

I will add, killing someone that is trying to kill you or your family is totally acceptable to me

I agree sheriff for me there's only one acceptable reason to kill another human, and that's to protect someone else from being harmed by them. Like if someone walked in on her trying to harm a baby and the only way to stop her was to shoot her, by all means, shoot her.

But to do it as punishment? I just don't understand, really. Like I said, a dead person isn't upset that they're dead... they're just dead. If anything the only people further punished by executing her would be her own parents... and despite LT's insistence otherwise, I just don't think it offers any real benefit to the families of the victims to make it worth it.


And again I would add the caveat that it should never be done on trials by evidence/jury because the verdict IS sometimes wrong. As before that's not me passing comment on this particular case, just pointing out that it does happen, and there are examples of people being executed and then further evidence casting doubt that they were guilty, and a few rare examples of it being outright proven that they were NOT guilty, both in the US and here in the UK when we still had capital punishment.

[Swan]

Youtube video

[arista]

[arista]

[Zizu]

This monster has cost Ł1.5 million in court costs and a further Ł2 million for her legal aid fees !!

Aghhhh !!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[UserSince2005]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

All circumstantial evidence. Let hope the Manchester prosecution haven’t cocked this up like they did that guy they accused as a rapist and locked up for 15 years

Looks like they have proper ****ed this up given all the recent news speculation.

She will be out before long most likely.

[arista]

BBC News Text:
[The paper's main story is an exclusive about
a potential upcoming documentary on Lucy Letby,
the British nurse who was sentenced
to 15 whole life terms after being convicted
of killing seven babies and trying
to kill seven more.
Sources tell the Mirror that Netflix is
"working with production company ITN"
to deliver it.]

[UserSince2005]

Netflix going to expose our NHS and Judicial system. This is going to be juicy.
If it can happen to Lucy it’s can happen to us.
If it can happen to those poor babies it can happen to our babies.
Time to expose the true evil in this country!

[Livia]

The NHS is a mess on every level. It's prime for both crimes and mistakes to happen. I do not trust the NHS and that's a sad thing for a Brit to say.

[arista]

[arista]

[user104658]

Whole thing still stinks of scapegoating for massive systemic failures. In my opinion.

[arista]

[Cherie]

Looks like a miscarriage of justice

Lucy Letby's lawyers and an independent panel of medical experts have presented "new medical evidence" in the case of the killer nurse that they say casts doubt on her conviction.

https://www.bing.com/search?pglt=299...ANNTA1&PC=LCTS

[Crimson Dynamo]

Dan Wootton @DANwootton

Many people will not want to hear this, but I repeat after months of my own research...
LUCY LETBY IS INNOCENT AND HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO ONE OF THE BIGGEST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE IN BRITISH HISTORY.
I know how difficult this is to accept because it smashes your trust in the NHS, MSM and UK judiciary.
But that is the reality.



https://x.com/danwootton/status/1886739523561779464

[UserSince2005]

evil NHS makes me sick

[Cherie]

Lucy Letby did not murder a single baby, experts have claimed.

Presenting “significant new medical evidence” in the case of the convicted killer, a panel of experts in the care of newborn babies alleged that they had died as a result of the poor care they had received.

On Tuesday, analysis conducted by a committee of 14 neonatologists was revealed at a press conference in central London.

Letby, 35, from Hereford, is serving 15 whole-life orders for the murder of seven infants and attempted murder of seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016.

But Dr Shoo Lee, a Canadian neonatologist whose work was cited by the prosecution in the original trial, was critical of the care received by the babies and told the hearing that his work had been misinterpreted and misused by the Crown Prosecution Service.


“In our opinion, the medical opinion, the medical evidence doesn’t support murder in any of these babies – just natural causes and bad medical care.”

During the hearing, Dr Lee talked through a number of the babies and listed failings in the care provided to them or natural causes. In one case, he said doctors had failed to spot a dangerous bacterial infection in one baby, who later died, saying it was a “preventable death”.

The Telegraph

[Crimson Dynamo]

well this is turning into a sh1t show and no mistake

[Niamh.]

Jesus, how awful for her if that's true. What a thing to be wrongly convicted of

[bots]

it's one of those situations that you just don't know how to react. The original trial jury must have been convinced by the evidence that was presented to them, what has changed now. I don't think anything has changed

[rusticgal]

I thought they found some sort of diary she kept where she wrote messages of her guit and evil behaviour?..

[UserSince2005]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I thought they found some sort of diary she kept where she wrote messages of her guit and evil behaviour?..

I think she is a bit mental.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bots

it's one of those situations that you just don't know how to react. The original trial jury must have been convinced by the evidence that was presented to them, what has changed now. I don't think anything has changed

The guy whose work was cited to convict her says his research was misinterpreted and he believes the babies died due to issues on the ward not down to one single person, Lucy Letby had previously highlighted issues on the ward as well