[Rustic bauble]

On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...

One of the reasons she began to be so hated was because she refused to show you all her new born baby.

[jet]

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by jet

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

She is and it's no surprise. She has used her father and sister in a similar way

Chilling

[Rustic bauble]

Nothing more left in the pot….its time to opt for the ‘private life’ they both desperately craved.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by jet

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

No one is entitled to see their children.

[Urban Cragou]

Originally Posted by jet

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Meghan Markle Posts a Stunning New Photo of Archie and Lilibet in Her Garden

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Oops

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Redway

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

No one said they didn’t…

[Urban Cragou]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

No one said they didn’t…

“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

No one said they didn’t…

And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

[jet]

Originally Posted by Redway

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

Privacy for the kids until she is pushing an important money spinning venture, like the 2022 Netflix documentary. Out came little Archie, face and all.
Now that she is desperate for this latest venture to succeed, she has mentioned details about the kids at least a dozen times in the last few weeks. She’s just a struggling working Mom, don’t you know.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

what on earth

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

what on earth

What's wrong?

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by Cherie

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Redway

“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”

Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Cherie

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

Its exactly what he is doing.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy

Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.

It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Its exactly what he is doing.

Originally Posted by Glenn.

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.

As you ignored the response and instead choose to try and come for me.

Very on topic to be discussing the vile entitlement of that baby that day was sickening. A sign of the unhinged behaviour that has snowballed.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

It’s the same thing. It’s the parents decision to show their baby to the world. And you guys hated that they didn’t and excused your unhinged entitlement as “she’s breaking tradition”

It’s weird as ****

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.

It was clearly said in jest...and you have both turned it into something else...but if its the best you can do then carry on....anyway who is interested in seeing the back of people in a photograph....

[Good King Glennceslas]

The “it was a joke” line

Debate over I think