FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chat and Games Looking for forum games, and completely off topic banter - this is your place! (includes Virtual Big Brother type forum games) |
View Poll Results: Which of these would make good viewing? | ||||||
Benjamin |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 52.94% | |||
|
||||||
Niamh |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 52.94% | |||
|
||||||
Ammi |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
AnnieK |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
Crimson D |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 58.82% | |||
|
||||||
Beso |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 41.18% | |||
|
||||||
Strictly Jake |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 17.65% | |||
|
||||||
Vanessa |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 41.18% | |||
|
||||||
Mock |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 35.29% | |||
|
||||||
Livia |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
Sheriff |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 35.29% | |||
|
||||||
Glenn |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
Josiah |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 29.41% | |||
|
||||||
BBX |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% | |||
|
||||||
Jones |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% | |||
|
||||||
Dogeatdog |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
Barry |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 41.18% | |||
|
||||||
Cherie |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 52.94% | |||
|
||||||
Kazanne |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 35.29% | |||
|
||||||
MTVN |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
James |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% | |||
|
||||||
RusticGal |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% | |||
|
||||||
Redway |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% | |||
|
||||||
Zizu |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 41.18% | |||
|
||||||
Other. Who? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% | |||
|
||||||
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#77 | |||
|
||||
Piss orf.
|
Quote:
Strictly Jake. Cause it's a mean thing to do..JUST LIKE A DOUBLE EVICTION IN WEEK ONE!!!! But I'm over it now.... So maybe Cherie. Last edited by Beso; 25-07-2025 at 10:31 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#81 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
Last edited by Redway; 26-07-2025 at 01:20 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |||
|
||||
SIGH
|
He’d be very disappointing. All mouth on his VT. Zero entertainment value in the house.
__________________
![]() Calling bigotry an opinion is like calling arsenic a flavour. ………….
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |||
|
||||
Piss orf.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#88 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Thanks Kate, I appreciate your confidence on that lol.
I think Redway has summed you up as a Housemate quite well.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#90 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
So let’s hear more about your irritable side, Mock, to the extent that you’re comfortable sharing. What does that look like for you typically, and how do you think it might pop out in the Big-Brother house?
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#91 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#92 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
As soon as someone started talking about "toxic masculinity" in the house, you'd start seeing a more ugly side to my personality. ![]() Or if a Housemate was sticking up for another Housemate who was being a dickhead towards me, just because "they're friends with each other" that would also make me really annoyed with both of them tbh.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
And that ironically would make me more angry towards them.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Yep. In psychological language it’s called triangulation. Not everyone knows just-how toxic it is or how-much they’re showing themselves up whenever they side with someone they don’t even particularly like just to gang in on you. It’s different when there’s a genuine reason for them to dislike you but when it’s based on nothing more than misread vibes or just personal distaste, it’s sickening the lengths some people will go to to cast you as the odd one out. To people who don’t think very deeply about interpersonal psychology, it might sound “out there” but the fact that something’s out or someone’s reach of experience or understanding doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Triangulation is a very nasty tactic when it’s unfounded.
Me, I’m not pristine when it comes to that but if and when I do triangulate, at-least I have my reasons. Genuine reasons. Last edited by Redway; 26-07-2025 at 12:27 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I'm admittedly just a hypocrite that hates it when it has been done to me. ![]()
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
No-one likes to be triangulated, to be fair, but to me there’s a definite line that’s crossed when the people doing it don’t even know you; they’ve just decided to take a dislike to you for reasons that have nothing to do with you as you truly are (like I said elsewhere). Empty leverage from something you said years ago that they never understood (even and especially at the time), vague impressions, misread tone (which can happen a lot online, naturally), you might remind them of someone they don’t like. Sometimes it’s resentment they’ve been holding onto that was never really yours to carry, but now you’re the scapegoat for whatever unresolved mess they’ve clung to. Anything. Either way, Mock, it ain’t your bag to carry and it ain’t mine, either. People will construct a whole load of imaginary nonsense about who you are based on scraps overripe for the bin. Just got to let them stew and keep chasing shadows. They don’t know you well enough to have a problem with you. They have a problem with who they think you are, and what’s more important than what other people think about you is what you (and other people who truly know you) know about yourself. If someone thinks you’re arrogant (for-example) and you know you’re not, that’s their misperception, their projection, not reality. And they’ll likely get it into their skulls eventually, no-matter the noise they make in-between.
Last edited by Redway; 26-07-2025 at 10:05 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I definitely wouldn't like it if someone was being hostile to me because I remind them of someone that they don't like. How would that be my fault? Is the way that I would see it.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
If it’s dislike not based on association but vague memories from years ago (and maybe that could happen in the BB house; ’tis a small world, after-all), they’re falling into a trap there and most of the time are too self-absorbed in their own silly narrative of you to see it. Dislike for people you don’t have an overarching familiarity with in-person as a base should be less rigid than fluid, and evolve with time (whether that’s towards hating you even-more, with new examples and experiences that consolidate that perspective on you for them, or softening to you a little bit). If it’s just the same-old “you were a borderline-alcoholic 4/7 years ago,” “you remind me of the guy who cheated on my mate 11 years ago,” and it never meaningfully evolves, they’re trapped in their disdain for you and showing just-how empty and irrelevant it is. Dislike without direct personal experience should evolve given new context, for better or worse. They can keep saying the same thing about you until they’re blue in the face or try and give you a reputation that never truly belonged to you but, again, you know yourself better than they do. They only have scraps, filtered through their own biases and likely taken out of context. You have decades’ worth of experience being … you. People who are older than you will always make out that you’re always going to be in their shadow in terms of general life-experience but where you’re your in person qualified to stand and bask in your own light (heck, get a tan in it) is when it comes to experiences unique to you and the overall experience of being you. No stranger can take that away from you or erase that, especially when all they’ve got on you is old news that was likely never taken in properly or contextualised in t’first place. People like that really aren’t worth the combat. When you’re firm in your self-knowledge, other people’s projections are like bad weather: they might rattle the windows, but they can’t alter the house. You can still defend yourself and try and close the windows as much as you can, but it doesn’t change what’s going on in the house either way, does it? They’re playing with puzzle-pieces yhey don’t know how to fit or contextualise, getting stuck on narrative-loop (almost as-if they’ve got the wrong person, which they kind of have in the first place anyway), while you’ve been living in the full picture, pieced together perfectly on a golden table, every day. No amount of “arrogant but must be playing dumb, despite you obviously being an intellectual, if I’m not important or relevant enough in your life to figure out why I’ve decided to have random beef with you,” “empty,” “borderline-raging alkie,” “you’s a nobody and Billy-no-mates, always sitting on your own, despite the fact that you work directly with people” or “condescending and abrasive” abuse can change that. It’s just pure foolishness at that point, and that’s their problem. You don’t need to hang onto negativity from people you wouldn’t know from a can of Carnation milk on the streets. TLDR: you’re good, buddy. Don’t hang onto negativity from people who don’t know you at-all but just like to project. Let them have a tangible reason if they want to come up to your face and tell you they’ve decided they’re not gonna like you. On the web., likewise, it’s definitely not you half the time; it’s a blurry, outdated snapshot of you filtered through their own biases and hangups. And it’s important, really important, not to let anyone gaslight you into accepting their story as your truth. Last edited by Redway; 27-07-2025 at 11:56 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() I can see (and agree) with where you're coming from.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|