[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by BBXX

The migrant wasn't at the hotel, either though. He was being held in custody.

There aren't hundreds of young priests hanging around town centres are there, or did I miss something, also there was a second assault inside the hotel

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...ylum%20seekers.

The 32-year-old has been charged with two counts of common assault, four counts of assault by beating and one count of sexual assault on a man.

The three-star establishment has been at the centre of a series of anti-migrant protests held outside state-funded accommodation for asylum seekers.

[Cherry Christmas]

Coming back to the story, the good news is he will be sent down

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Coming back to the story, the good news is he will be sent down

You're quite right on both counts. I got distracted.

Yes, great news he will be sent down but why has it taken so LONG to get to this place, like concerns and complaints were raised decades ago. Horrific for all involved. I hope all the women involved are around to see justice be done.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

There aren't hundreds of young priests hanging around town centres are there, or did I miss something, also there was a second assault inside the hotel

We need to normalise being ashamed of tarring entire demographics with the same brush because of the actions of a few again.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by BBXX

We need to normalise being ashamed of tarring entire demographics with the same brush because of the actions of a few again.

its worked for people with priests for years and no one bats an eyelid, Im not even religious but I can see the double standards applied regularly

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

its worked for people with priests for years and no one bats an eyelid, Im not even religious but I can see the double standards applied regularly

I think you're ignoring a huge amount of context - whether intentionally or not I am not sure - that separate the two.

Yes, there is some rhetoric around preists and pedophilia, but usually these kind of statements are used in defence toward a religious person linking pedophilia with homosexuality - usually in the context of "have you seen the stats for priests and sexual abuse?" Groups of people don't protest outside churches against all priests that exist because of the actions of a few.

Protesting at large outside a residence housing brown people asking them to be ejected from the country to 'protect are kids' because two (at the time one) people in that group are sexual predators is verrrrrrrry different.

[bots]

Originally Posted by BBXX

I think you're ignoring a huge amount of context - whether intentionally or not I am not sure - that separate the two.

Yes, there is some rhetoric around preists and pedophilia, but usually these kind of statements are used in defence toward a religious person linking pedophilia with homosexuality - usually in the context of "have you seen the stats for priests and sexual abuse?" Groups of people don't protest outside churches against all priests that exist because of the actions of a few.

Protesting at large outside a residence housing brown people asking them to be ejected from the country to 'protect are kids' because two (at the time one) people in that group are sexual predators is verrrrrrrry different.

they are not protesting about brown people. They are protesting about immigrants that have arrived here illegally being housed in hotels at the tax payers expense. They are protesting because it has actually decreased the living standards of the sick and elderly in this country that have a right to be here. What's difficult to understand about that?

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by bots

they are not protesting about brown people. They are protesting about immigrants that have arrived here illegally being housed in hotels at the tax payers expense. They are protesting because it has actually decreased the living standards of the sick and elderly in this country that have a right to be here. What's difficult to understand about that?

Precisely, they are also protesting about a hundred plus young men or in the case of Bournemouth 300 plus young men just being landed into an area with nothing to do and nowhere to go apart from sit around in groups in towns, groups of men of any colour are intimidating to walk past, they are also sick of being told there is no money for services, that they will have to work until they are 70 and all that energy prices will increase again, and they can look forward to more tax rises in the Autumn, if the government could look after the tax payer as well as they do people who arrive unvetted on boats I doubt there would be as much anger

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by bots

they are not protesting about brown people. They are protesting about immigrants that have arrived here illegally being housed in hotels at the tax payers expense. They are protesting because it has actually decreased the living standards of the sick and elderly in this country that have a right to be here. What's difficult to understand about that?

You just need to look at the protesters beautiful handmade signs to see it’s very much about ‘safety for women and children’, it’s about them “being close to schools” it’s about “protect are kids” which is where the issue is - that they’re framing all living there are a risk to children and women because a couple of them are sickos.

[bots]

Originally Posted by BBXX

You just need to look at the protesters beautiful handmade signs to see it’s very much about ‘safety for women and children’, it’s about them “being close to schools” it’s about “protect are kids” which is where the issue is - that they’re framing all living there are a risk to children and women because a couple of them are sickos.

the simple fact is there are many multiples of reasons why these illegal immigrants are not wanted and not simply because they are brown

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by BBXX

You just need to look at the protesters beautiful handmade signs to see it’s very much about ‘safety for women and children’, it’s about them “being close to schools” it’s about “protect are kids” which is where the issue is - that they’re framing all living there are a risk to children and women because a couple of them are sickos.

"a few bad apples"