[Beso]

Ignoring the government's tyranny because you dont like a person is only good for the tyranny to continue unabated.

[arista]

[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

That's not how it happened..if she hadn't pled guilty she would have got 4.5 years...she pled guilty, bit the judge still started h8s sentencing at 4.5 years, then reduced for the guilty plea to 3.

He could have started at 3, then reduced for the guilty plea.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

She has given an interview in the Telegraph
Good, she deleted her tweet

Which is better than what Online Only Dan
can give

Actually no, I disagree.

What would have been good from her would have been to have considered her family FIRST and rather than have to delete a post she voluntary and planned to post, to have actually never posted such a worded post in the first place.

Because of that I have not a scrap of sympathy for her or liking of her, for the vile and despicable wording she used in her post.
What she stands for from her own inner prejudice.

It should be of no surprise that a creep like Dan Wootton would be supportive of her.

[Beso]

Wasn't she considering her dead child and how the nhs was complicit in its death when she made the tweet.

A natural action from a mother already let down by the state as she watches the Southport attack on all those other children that were also let down by the state, who had that evil bastard on its watchlists.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Actually no, I disagree.

What would have been good from her would have been to have considered her family FIRST and rather than have to delete a post she voluntary and planned to post, to have actually never posted such a worded post in the first place.

Because of that I have not a scrap of sympathy for her or liking of her, for the vile and despicable wording she used in her post.
What she stands for from her own inner prejudice.

It should be of no surprise that a creep like Dan Wootton would be supportive of her.

Of course.

But she is in today's Respected Telegraph newspaper


A moment of madness to post on Twitter.


You had the wrong info at that time.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Of course.

But she is in today's Respected Telegraph newspaper


A moment of madness to post on Twitter.


You had the wrong info at that time.

oh come on, respected Telegraph publication.

It's one of the most ridiculously biased publications ever and particularly against any government that's not Conservative.
Why people waste in excess of Ł500 yearly buying it astounds me, they must have money to burn.

Of course it will give her a platform, hardly a surprise.
I'm surprised it wasn't the Daily Mail actually.

[arista]

"oh come on, respected Telegraph publication"


They have more respect than Online Only Dan

It's what I Say

[Crimson Dynamo]

But Mrs Connolly said Mr Jones, who had walked free from court, had rightly
not deserved to go to jail either. She said: “I’m pleased that the justice system
did work for Ricky Jones and I’m glad that he was able to get bail and he was
able to get good legal advice and have time to stop and think about how he was
going to plead. I wasn’t given that luxury.

“I don’t advocate that we should be throwing anyone in jail for saying…
something that he shouldn’t have done. It was silly. Does it really make him a
criminal? Should we be putting people like him and I in prison? Absolutely not.”

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

But Mrs Connolly said Mr Jones, who had walked free from court, had rightly
not deserved to go to jail either. She said: “I’m pleased that the justice system
did work for Ricky Jones and I’m glad that he was able to get bail and he was
able to get good legal advice and have time to stop and think about how he was
going to plead. I wasn’t given that luxury.

“I don’t advocate that we should be throwing anyone in jail for saying…
something that he shouldn’t have done. It was silly. Does it really make him a
criminal? Should we be putting people like him and I in prison? Absolutely not.”

Very gracious of her, he had plenty time to get good counsel, she was railroaded in and probably told she would get off as she had no previous if she pleaded guilty which would be the norm, look at the Welsh guy who choked and kicked his girlfriend, no previous was taken into account and a suspended sentence handed out, she was definately made an example of.... and it was criminal to take away a mother from her child for that length of time, they could have given her 6 weeks it would still have had the same impact, I wish her well, I think she will make alot of money off the back of her dubious celebrity

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

Tbh it should have been a suspended sentence.

No way was what she did bad enough to warrant jail time.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Tbh it should have been a suspended sentence.

No way was what she did bad enough to warrant jail time.

Yes I agree. She did not deserve to go to jail. I hope she uses and wins.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Beso

That's not how it happened..if she hadn't pled guilty she would have got 4.5 years...

IF found guilty. Any decent lawyer would have been able to get her off on a jury trial.

[joeysteele]

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

This woman got far less for posting it was acceptable to burn human beings alive in a building, from her prejudice against those people.

Yet she gets support.
That really speaks volumes that this Country is really going into dangerously ugly prejudiced depths.

[Glenn.]

Watching her interviews, well no actually, watching her be used by the right wing as their poster girl whilst telling everyone she’s Starmers poster girl just confirms she has zero remorse for what she posted. She’s also not very bright.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

Disgusting act of vandalism and destroying an iconic part of Northern England. Should have gotten longer.

What they did caused actual, material, real world damage. They didn't write some mean words (which were soon deleted).

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Watching her interviews, well no actually, watching her be used by the right wing as their poster girl whilst telling everyone she’s Starmers poster girl just confirms she has zero remorse for what she posted. She’s also not very bright.

Just watched snippets of her interview with Alisson Pearson, she seems very articulate, she is not media trained, so not sure what brings you to that conclusion

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Just watched snippets of her interview, she seems very articulate, she is not media trained, so not sure what brings you to that conclusion

Maybe watch more than snippets

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Maybe watch more than snippets

why are you watching the full interview?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

why are you watching the full interview?

I like to be informed so I can form actual opinions. Surely you’ve watched the full interview given the over the top support you seem to have shown her?

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I like to be informed so I can form actual opinions.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I like to be informed so I can form actual opinions.

That is exactly as I thought

[Glenn.]

I wonder why you haven’t watched it?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Maybe watch more than snippets

So you can't answer the question?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

So you can't answer the question?

You don’t even know the question. You haven’t watched it.

But let’s be real, she’s not off to a good start because of what got her in the mess to begin with.

Or would you disagree and say wanting hotels with human beings inside burned down is something a clever person would say?