Quote:
Originally Posted by Beso
Yeah.
But not gloat after something actually happened that you atupidly said you wouldn't mind happening.
Cause that's hiding your guilt about your original thought coming to fruition. A normal person would apologise and feel some guilt for saying what the thought they felt before seeing what happened explode on their TV and phone screens.
Thinking stuff like that is ok, and airing those thoughts in an acceptable manner(ie, not in front of a hostile crowd) is also OK.
But to push that narrative after the narrative happened, is not OK.
It is why people are now back tracking like crazy in their responses to charlie kirks death.
Not in TIBB, but out there in the other world.
|
But again it’s contradictory. You want people to have free speech to say whatever they want, but not everyone.
Neither narrative (gloating at Charlie Kirk’s death/saying Kier Starmer needs to be assassinated) should be said out loud publicly.