Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16-12-2008, 03:53 PM #29
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,266


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,266


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NettoSuperstar!
But to suggest that management or social work teams would take a baby away from the mother for no good reason other than meeting targets and getting cash incentives is barmy.

But this is what Hammersmith and Fulham Council Admitted to doing

As for the Family Courts, they are little more than rubber stamps according to John Hemming MP who has specialised in this field.

Plus we have the case in Nottingham with Baby G where the social services seized the baby unlawfully, and a High Court judge ordered them to return the child. It was by fluke that was heard in the high court, rather than the family court, otherwise we would never have heard about this case.
Sticks is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
control, services, social


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts