[McNab]

Originally posted by superfanno1
Any 'deals' she might get post-eviction should almost certainly result in her benefits being stopped.

She can use that money to pay for her revolting ciggie habbit, the vile dog.

Why should the taxpayer have to fund her nicotine addiction?

Although, having said that, the most likely deal she'll get is advertising dog food - with her eating the product

Lets hope your never in a situation where u have to rely on benifits to get by due to injury or all earners in ure house being laid off.

I mean Why should the tax payers fuel you need for food and a roof over your head. Never judge someone when you don't know the reason behind it.

Although i agree with the Vile dog comment.