 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Rachel winning was not a protest on my behalf anyway. And neither was Ulrika
Rachel won for the simple Fact that she displayed courage, class and patience in the face of adversity, she was quirky, fun and not afraid to help her other housemates.
We as a viewing public like to award positive traits in people.
So were as Rex and even Sara were great Value housemates, Rex was very much the Villain of the later half of BB9 so the public do not like to award negative traits.
Ulrika was simply the best out of the remaining housemates, she was fun, didnt take herself to seriously, motherly, articulate and interesting and didnt take any nonsense.
She won on behalf of strong women.
Im sick of FM members pandering to the male housemates because they think the way they act is cool and they are playing the geezer, when theyve simply demonstrated every loathsome characteristic of the male personality. Theyre morally reprehensible, vulgar, insensitive, selfish, chauvanistic etc etc
It pains when FM celebrate such vulgar characteristics yet are quick enough to lambast any female who shows even one of them
|