[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by informer

Would you physically attack a neighbour over a fence?

You're hearing one side of a misconstrued story. Who's to say the neighbor didn't instigate things?

And you can clearly see that the blood has spread/been smeared around his face.

[informer]

Originally Posted by BlackOrWhite

You're hearing one side of a misconstrued story. Who's to say the neighbor didn't instigate things?

And you can clearly see that the blood has spread/been smeared around his face.

i think the fact vinnie has and will always been known as a violent thug proves it wasnt instigated by the neighbour

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by informer

i think the fact vinnie has and will always been known as a violent thug proves it wasnt instigated by the neighbour

How does it? Surely proof would be a statement to that effect, not just a reputation. But hey when has the truth ever bothered you Gazza?

[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by Shasown

How does it? Surely proof would be a statement to that effect, not just a reputation. But hey when has the truth ever bothered you Gazza?

He was found guilty.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

He was found guilty.

Good to see you understand how the law works, he actually plead guilty, and his plea of guilty was accepted by the court as was his statement of mitigation.

[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Good to see you understand how the law works, he actually plead guilty, and his plea of guilty was accepted by the court as was his statement of mitigation.

He plead guilty = he was found guilty. There's no distinction in law wrt guilt.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

He plead guilty = he was found guilty. There's no distinction in law wrt guilt.

Once again incorrect, if you go to trial and then plead guilty before a decision is made as to your guilt, you will receive a lesser sentence than if you go to trial pleading innocence and then get found guilty.

I would say it may be a technicality but it is a distinction in law.

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

He plead guilty = he was found guilty. There's no distinction in law wrt guilt.

You can't be found guilty if you've pleaded it.

[informer]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Good to see you understand how the law works, he actually plead guilty, and his plea of guilty was accepted by the court as was his statement of mitigation.

So he is guilty of crime? thats all we need to know..thanks