About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

There you go LT
Fact.

I take my Arista facts the same way I take my boiled eggs...

(and both incidently originate from a hen's arse)

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

There you go LT
Fact.

and the guy is clearly miming

like JLS did

arista · 22-02-2010, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne

Youtube video

LT
No this is all good sense,
infact Pat on this VT
is Bang On Right.

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

LT
No this is all good sense,
infact Pat on this VT
is Bang On Right.

yes he is a big you tube hit

like Susan Boyle

and Charlie bit my finger

Dr.Gonzo · 22-02-2010, 03:42 PM

I've been hearing a lot about Jesus loving cock lately. Maybe they should implement this new information into weekly mass...? What do you think, LT?? Imagine the poor bastard mincing up that hill with a sore arse and a big wooden bondage rack on his back....

I heard a guy kissed him just before he died.

M X · 22-02-2010, 03:48 PM

Yes, most defintely. lol.

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 03:50 PM

What is rather surprising is that this should be seen as a slur, jumped upon by the new village atheists excitedly

i thought that being gay was not a bad thing in 2010?

Shasown · 22-02-2010, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Yes well perhaps my use of Noddy Holder would suggest a certain light-hearted tone to the post!

A factual statement about the birth date of Jesus and the Christian celebration of Christmas was not my intention, nor was it Noddies..

Yeah its not a problem. One date is as good as another i suppose.

Take your pick

April 17, 6 BC/BCE

June 17, 2 BC/BCE

September 8th 4BC/BCE

September 11th, 3 BC/BCE

Would show God had a sense of humour if he was born on April 17th, however he was definately born before 1 BC/BCE

Dr.Gonzo · 22-02-2010, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

What is rather surprising is that this should be seen as a slur, jumped upon by the new village atheists excitedly

i thought that being gay was not a bad thing in 2010?

It isn't. But we village atheists know that Christians think otherwise and rejoice at rubbing Jesus' pink crotchless sexy-wear in your brainwashed little faces.

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Gonzo

It isn't. But we village atheists know that Christians think otherwise and rejoice at rubbing Jesus' pink crotchless sexy-wear in your brainwashed little faces.

..always with the sex angle

i would try a rectangle

Dr.Gonzo · 22-02-2010, 04:10 PM

The 'sex angle'? I would think that it's a vallid area of thought in a thread about Jesus being gay.

I'm sure you would try anything.

Shasown · 22-02-2010, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr.Gonzo

I've been hearing a lot about Jesus loving cock lately. Maybe they should implement this new information into weekly mass...? What do you think, LT?? Imagine the poor bastard mincing up that hill with a sore arse and a big wooden bondage rack on his back....

I heard a guy kissed him just before he died.

PMSL, you better hope there isnt a god otherwise you will go straight to hell.

Incidentally he may have just been a giver and not a taker.

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:22 PM

Luke 20:9-19

He began to tell the people this parable. "A man planted a vineyard, and rented it out to some farmers, and went into another country for a long time. At the proper season, he sent a servant to the farmers to collect his share of the fruit of the vineyard. But the farmers beat him, and sent him away empty. He sent yet another servant, and they also beat him, and treated him shamefully, and sent him away empty. He sent yet a third, and they also wounded him, and threw him out. The lord of the vineyard said, ‘What shall I do? I will send my beloved son. It may be that seeing him, they will respect him.’ "But when the farmers saw him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, that the inheritance may be ours.’ They threw him out of the vineyard, and killed him. What therefore will the lord of the vineyard do to them? He will come and destroy these farmers, and will give the vineyard to others." When they heard it, they said, "May it never be!" But he looked at them, and said, "Then what is this that is written, ‘The stone which the builders rejected, The same was made the chief cornerstone?’ "Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces, But it will crush whomever it falls on to dust." The chief priests and the scribes sought to lay hands on Him that very hour, but they feared the people—for they knew He had spoken this parable against them.

arista · 22-02-2010, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

What is rather surprising is that this should be seen as a slur, jumped upon by the new village atheists excitedly

i thought that being gay was not a bad thing in 2010?

Ask the Mental Pope.

ElProximo · 22-02-2010, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne

Almost every Christian has a different answer to if Jesus is god or not.

That is not true.
For nearly 2000 years there is tremendous unity on the nature of Christ and of Him being God incarnate.
Even as far back to the earliest councils recorded we see the earliest Christians having very little disagreement and even that being on 'how' He was God incarnate.
For centuries Christians around the world and crossing denominations recited the Nicene, Apostles creeds every Sunday,
and,
to this day, even with as many 'exceptions proving the rule' we see a massive global church of so many denominations which acknowledge this. Even those disagreeing intensely on many 'in house' issues will be in total agreement on the nature of Christ.

So why you said something like this really amazes me. Its as if you just thought it 'sounded good' and fit your worldview of what you would like Christianity to 'come across' like... and so you wrote it.
Hoping it would just fly.

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo

That is not true.
For nearly 2000 years there is tremendous unity on the nature of Christ and of Him being God incarnate.
Even as far back to the earliest councils recorded we see the earliest Christians having very little disagreement and even that being on 'how' He was God incarnate.
For centuries Christians around the world and crossing denominations recited the Nicene, Apostles creeds every Sunday,
and,
to this day, even with as many 'exceptions proving the rule' we see a massive global church of so many denominations which acknowledge this. Even those disagreeing intensely on many 'in house' issues will be in total agreement on the nature of Christ.

So why you said something like this really amazes me. Its as if you just thought it 'sounded good' and fit your worldview of what you would like Christianity to 'come across' like... and so you wrote it.
Hoping it would just fly.

well said my wrestling friend

InOne · 22-02-2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo

That is not true.
For nearly 2000 years there is tremendous unity on the nature of Christ and of Him being God incarnate.
Even as far back to the earliest councils recorded we see the earliest Christians having very little disagreement and even that being on 'how' He was God incarnate.
For centuries Christians around the world and crossing denominations recited the Nicene, Apostles creeds every Sunday,
and,
to this day, even with as many 'exceptions proving the rule' we see a massive global church of so many denominations which acknowledge this. Even those disagreeing intensely on many 'in house' issues will be in total agreement on the nature of Christ.

So why you said something like this really amazes me. Its as if you just thought it 'sounded good' and fit your worldview of what you would like Christianity to 'come across' like... and so you wrote it.
Hoping it would just fly.

Catholics and everyone else disagree about it. Which is why the Catholic Church also uses different texts. Would you care to explain the trinity to me then 1+1+1=1???????????

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne

Catholics and everyone else disagree about it. Which is why the Catholic Church also uses different texts. Would you care to explain the trinity to me then 1+1+1=1???????????

Read the Bible if you seek answers

or go to church

http://www.carm.org/trinity

InOne · 22-02-2010, 04:41 PM

Just explain the trinity please, in your own words.

Vicky. · 22-02-2010, 04:45 PM

Who cares if jesus was gay?

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Who cares if jesus was gay?

Christians would but he was not so it is a moot point

not many people are gay, only around 4% of the total population specify that as their sexual proclivity

Vicky. · 22-02-2010, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Christians would but he was not so it is a moot point

And you know this how?

And christians are ridiculous tbh...being gay does not change a person

Crimson Dynamo · 22-02-2010, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne

Just explain the trinity please, in your own words.

"God is a trinity of persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Father is not the same person as the Son; the Son is not the same person as the Holy Spirit; and the Holy Spirit is not the same person as Father. They are not three gods and not three beings. They are three distinct persons; yet, they are all the one God. Each has a will, can speak, can love, etc., and these are demonstrations of personhood. They are in absolute perfect harmony consisting of one substance. They are coeternal, coequal, and copowerful. If any one of the three were removed, there would be no God."

this ^^^