[Stu]

Originally Posted by Tom

Using long words to make yourself sound credible and talking about watching your mates use it doesn't mean you're point is any more valid. For all I know what you're saying is mere opinion, and if you're going to make a point (whether being asked to prove a negative or not) then at least have the proof to back it up. Wikipedia doesn't count, nor do the little nuggets of information you give without a reputable source. If you expect others to provide one, then at least provide them yourself. My proof might just be based on an ill informed news item, but at least its something reputable to back up what I've said even if it is wrong.

Using long words? I gave you a list of chemicals because it's what you asked for. You know ... the chemicals that have no application whatsoever as plant feeder. Wikipedia certainly counts as the Mephedrone article is verifiably correct and sourced. Or do you think me or the folks at Wikipedia are making up chemicals from thin air purely to piss you off? Get a grip. Your proof is based on an ill informed news item. It's not a question of 'might be'. I have things to fall back on. You have nothing to fall back on. Nothing. You didn't even respond to 90% of my post yet you want me to respect your arrogant opinion based on facts that don't exist? Just give up. Mephedrone is not plant feeder.

The onus is not on me to prove a negative. Give me one single shred of evidence to suggest that Mephedrone posesses qualities as plant growth catalyst. Just one. I dare you. Your still demanding endless evidence off me yet you feel no need to return the favour? Are you well in the head? I give you a post too long for it's own good containing scientific fact and common sense logic about the nature of the Mephedrone business and you completely ignore it in favour of this fucking sewage I'm quoting?