[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Shasown

PMSL there is a comeback to that ..... nah sorry mate didnt mean to imply you were, just some people dont seem to understand there is a difference.

But yeah you are quite right in the point you made, forgiveness and acceptance dont seem to be the focus of many Christians. As far as I can recall Jesus never said its wrong for women to love one another or even for men to do likewise, that was man putting words into the mouth of god.

Christianity is based on the life and character of Jesus not of man

the "that is not a very Christian attitude" guff is so old it may yet make an InOne avatar

[InOne]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Christianity is based on the life and character of Jesus not of man

the "that is not a very Christian attitude" guff is so old it may yet make an InOne avatar

He is still watching you LT...

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Christianity is based on the life and character of Jesus not of man

the "that is not a very Christian attitude" guff is so old it may yet make an InOne avatar

Did Jesus say it is wrong of a man to take it up the chuff or not? Did he say it was wrong for a woman to lick and flick the bean of another woman?

If the answer is no, then who is man to decide what Jesus or his dad wanted.

I think his main message for people was something along the lines of unconditional love for each other, dont think he preconditioned that by saying so long as they are straight or any thing else. In fact didnt he set an example by giving his life for everyone, regardless of race colour belief or gender? Didnt he get crucified to bring salvation to everyone? Or am I missing something?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Did Jesus say it is wrong of a man to take it up the chuff or not? Did he say it was wrong for a woman to lick and flick the bean of another woman?

If the answer is no, then who is man to decide what Jesus or his dad wanted.

I think his main message for people was something along the lines of unconditional love for each other, dont think he preconditioned that by saying so long as they are straight or any thing else. In fact didnt he set an example by giving his life for everyone, regardless of race colour belief or gender? Didnt he get crucified to bring salvation to everyone? Or am I missing something?

You are missing something and have not read your Bible.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

You are missing something and have not read your Bible.

Really? Where?

You are telling me a man in his early 30's with long hair and a beard waltzing round the Middle East, with a bunch of other blokes, being a bit of a rebel and hacking off the Sanhedrin, pharisees scribes etc. didnt try a bit of hershey highway action at least once?

Or that all 12 of his merry men were absolutely straight? It only mentions one of them being married in the gospels. In those days most Jewish boys were married off early, in fact it was looked upon as duty in most of the society to marry and have children.

Isnt that the real reason why the christian faith as a whole have a major hardon for homosexuals, because the hero of their faith may have been one himself?


Ooops looks like I am going ta hell for that eh?