[Angus]

The nazi spirit is alive and well on this thread - no gays, no jews, no disabled, no upper class, no blacks, no immigrants,no old people etc etc - well that rules out most of my friends, family and acquaintances.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by 'Conor

if they were any normal housemate they would have been evicted early on, they only stayed so long because of their disabilty

Youre using one or two examples to make an ignorant sweeping statement. How many HMs have stayed in longer because they were hot looking? Dozens over the years. So if you wanna talk about unfair votes then I suggest you start banning hot looking ones because thats where the real shallowness occurs.

Viewers vote for disabled because they probably realise the struggle they have in everyday real life. How is that a shallow vote? Its a far better reason than "because theyre fit". Thats for sure.

['Conor]

Originally Posted by Zippy

Youre using one or two examples to make an ignorant sweeping statement. How many HMs have stayed in longer because they were hot looking? Dozens over the years. So if you wanna talk about unfair votes then I suggest you start banning hot looking ones because thats where the real shallowness occurs.

Viewers vote for disabled because they probably realise the struggle they have in everyday real life. How is that a shallow vote? Its a far better reason than "because theyre fit". Thats for sure.

yeah your right, but disabled people do get the sympathy vote

[Beso]

Originally Posted by 'conor

yeah your right, but disabled people do get the sympathy vote

they get the respect vote.

[InOne]

Originally Posted by Zippy

Youre using one or two examples to make an ignorant sweeping statement. How many HMs have stayed in longer because they were hot looking? Dozens over the years. So if you wanna talk about unfair votes then I suggest you start banning hot looking ones because thats where the real shallowness occurs.

Viewers vote for disabled because they probably realise the struggle they have in everyday real life. How is that a shallow vote? Its a far better reason than "because theyre fit". Thats for sure.

Think you're fighting a losing battle man, these lot are too far gone.

[mic8900]

tin of worms... look at the last few winners.... a shemale, gay, loud and annoying... the list goes on... so the chances of someone with a disability winning is pretty strong as the majority of straight male/female without issues of winning is pretty slim.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by mic8900

tin of worms... look at the last few winners.... a shemale, gay, loud and annoying... the list goes on... so the chances of someone with a disability winning is pretty strong as the majority of straight male/female without issues of winning is pretty slim.

Craig, Kate, Cameron, Anthony, Rachel, Sophie. None of them gay, loud or particularly annoying.

Normal people actually stand a very good chance of winning if surrounded by crazies.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by mic8900

tin of worms... look at the last few winners.... a shemale, gay, loud and annoying... the list goes on... so the chances of someone with a disability winning is pretty strong as the majority of straight male/female without issues of winning is pretty slim.

So what issues did Craig, Cameron, Kate, Anthony, Brian, Rachel, Sophie have then?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by mic8900

tin of worms... look at the last few winners.... a shemale, gay, loud and annoying... the list goes on... so the chances of someone with a disability winning is pretty strong as the majority of straight male/female without issues of winning is pretty slim.

sophie
brian
rachel
anthony
cameron
kate
craig

7/10 wakwaaa

[bbnut]

I've got no problem with disabled people going in and I do not think they get a free pass to the final. Pete was a great bloke, true some more simple minded people thought he was great because he swore alot, but he was a decent bloke, IIRC he was the only person who didn't gang up on Shahbaz (I know Shahbaz was a pain in the arse, but he didn't need to be ganged up on) He didn't bitch like most of the others, he was really entertaining and IMO he deserved to win. Mikey had his moments, he wasn't one of my favourites, but he had a sweet friendship with Rachel that people loved and he wasn't worried about saying what he thought, he could be quite funny with it too. Verne wasn't that great, but he also had his moments. Sophia had lupus before entering the house but she was kicked out pretty quick because she was a bitch.

So basically 1 disabled person wins and you say all disabled people will win? That hasn't actually happened though has it?

There's more to people than their disabilities, and that's what counts.

[Mac Hiavellian]

It could just depend on their personality. I've met disabled people who are absolute arseholes

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by Jase

You sound like a dick

This is pretty much the only reply the thread ever needed.

[eye sea]

All depends what the disability is. If it's a disability where other housemates feel embarrassed to be their normal selves, then no.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by eye sea

All depends what the disability is. If it's a disability where other housemates feel embarrassed to be their normal selves, then no.

So if a supposedly "normal" person feels uncomfortable around a disabled person, that's the disabled person's fault is it? What rubbish.

[pixee]

Get em in i say. It wasn't till the blind man of the big brother series i had to give up watching (forget the number) that i realised i could hate a blind man, they can be cock ends as well.

The theme of big brother is a bit "carny" it would be very dodgy i think if they had this theme then put midgets and so on in, people might think "freak show" and not in the normal big brother way.

[nickc25]

Originally Posted by Joe.

I know, it does seem really mean but it's the harsh reality.



Yeah. I know people are thinking that. It's reality, they wouldn't be so cruel as to evict a wounded war soldier first.

You lot are idiots. "Them" ?? Just because people are disabled why should people be treated differently? I am disabled and I hate people trying to treat me "different". We are not aliens, we are normal people but just cannot do things average people can do such as run. But then again a really fat lazy person cannot run anyway.

So because someone is disabled they should not have the same right as another person to go in the house? That is total wrong. Some of you are proper idiots and lack any form of knowledge. A disabled person can be a really nice person or a total twat - just like a "normal" person!!!


Pathetic thread.

[Angus]

Well, Steve blows the "disabled as victim" argument out of the water - he's done more in his life and IS still doing more in his life than most so called "normal" people.

[pixee]

nickc25 - Sorry but do we not need to identify the disability and treat it with some respect or should we stop building ramps cause we're all the same?

We aren't all the same though and we should aid people in anyway we can rather than just trump out "we are all the same" because "we are all the same" seems to me to lead to when people have special requirements there is resentment rather than understanding...

but i can see you are quite annoyed by some people on here so will let you vent lol

[pixee]

nickc25 - Sorry but do we not need to identify the disability and treat it with some respect or should we stop building ramps cause we're all the same?

We aren't all the same though and we should aid people in anyway we can rather than just trump out "we are all the same" because "we are all the same" seems to me to lead to when people have special requirements there is resentment rather than understanding...

but i can see you are quite annoyed by some people on here so will let you vent lol

[nickc25]

Originally Posted by simonsays

my dad sometimes parks in disabled only spots even thought there is nothing wrong with him, he does a fake limp though so its ok.

He does a fake limp so its "ok" to park in a space meant for someone that needs it? What a horrible human being your dad is. I would love it if he lost the ability to use his legs or even walk more than 5 metres, see how he loves people parking in disabled spaces then. They are there for a reason. Not for lazy ***** like your dad.

[nickc25]

Originally Posted by pixee

nickc25 - Sorry but do we not need to identify the disability and treat it with some respect or should we stop building ramps cause we're all the same?

We aren't all the same though and we should aid people in anyway we can rather than just trump out "we are all the same" because "we are all the same" seems to me to lead to when people have special requirements there is resentment rather than understanding...

but i can see you are quite annoyed by some people on here so will let you vent lol

I havent said "we are all the same" have I? I was saying that a disabled person can be a total idiot or a nice person. Doesnt matter what their body enables them to do or not to do does it?

I hate it when there is "pity" for someone that is disabled. Why should there be pity? A lot, if not most disabled people live just as good of a life as a non disabled person does.

I know many people who are lazy and cant be arsed with doing basic things yet because someone is disabled they are praised just for doing "normal" stuff. Sure I have to take a cocktail of painkillers to get through the day but I have a great life, everyone should be given the same opportunities. People like the person that made this thread make me sick. Not bothering to reply again as I have made my point.

Why not shoot all the black people, disabled people and old people and be done with it? Pathetic.

[pixee]

It's like joe off family guy lol you're normal we get it... I think the reason people might give a man who has no legs more credit for riding a bike or something is because he is kind of at a disadvantage from the get go, i don't think people mean to be patronising just it is more impressive to achieve a physical feat for which you are in someway impaired.

But i can see why it would annoy you.