[Claymores]

Originally Posted by Oooo_get_her

He didn't actually review it though, did he. He summarised it and gave a basic interpretation. That's not a review. Leastways I didn't hear him stating a critical opinion of the work or analysing its merits. Maybe I missed that bit.

Naw -you're correct

I was being sarcy and started the thread because his summary made him sound like he was describing the Beano as it was sooooooooooooooooo far away from what the book was about.

Maybe he'd just seen the dumbed-down cartoon movie version pr maybe he's thick