[BB_Eye]

Victor deserved his eviction in week 8, despite being an influential housemate. He behaved incredibly out of order that week and bitched about Shell for ages in the hope that it would make her snap. Lets put it this way, he couldn't even survive against Jason in that eviction.

[Patty178]

Originally Posted by Dannyboii

But your idea of no evictions is crap.

1. The show would never end

It would. It would come to a natural end about 10 weeks in, which would leave about 2 weeks for evictions (but with vote to save to give the entertaining ones half a chance).

2. People would never change

You don't know that since there hasn't been a whole series dedicated to what I'm proposing.

3. Friendship groups will never/rarely change

See 2.

4. Less interaction between different housemates

Unfounded.

Personally I like seeing controversial characters evicted, since it is fun to watch 'friends' of evictees try to socialise with people who they constantly bitched about etc. Do you not think it would be more interesting to watch someone like Keeva (for example) trying to mingle with the; Sunshine, JJ, Mario, Dave, Ben group, than it would be to watch the same people, bitching about the same people, over and over and over and.....

A stupid analysis.

If you give the HM's punishments on Friday, the BB production team could conjure up all sorts of nasty ways to get the housemates arguing/falling out. The possibilities would be endless and the entertainment value x10 better.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

patty nobody agrees with you

[Patty178]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

Victor deserved his eviction in week 8, despite being an influential housemate. He behaved incredibly out of order that week and bitched about Shell for ages in the hope that it would make her snap. Lets put it this way, he couldn't even survive against Jason in that eviction.

You thought Victor should have been evicted? Yet he was the best housemate in there and arguably the best of all time?? Shameful!

[Dannyboii]

Originally Posted by Patty178

It would. It would come to a natural end about 10 weeks in, which would leave about 2 weeks for evictions (but with vote to save to give the entertaining ones half a chance).



You don't know that since there hasn't been a whole series dedicated to what I'm proposing.




See 2.



Unfounded.



A stupid analysis.

If you give the HM's punishments on Friday, the BB production team could conjure up all sorts of nasty ways to get the housemates arguing/falling out. The possibilities would be endless and the entertainment value x10 better.

See your other thread, in posted in that. What YOU want out of BB, differs to what the MAJORITY wants. 70% of people do not want to see bitching and arguing. 30% do.

70% of people might vote for BNP, it doesn't make you wrong for disliking them, nor does it make you wrong for complaining about them, but that is how democracy works. Its about trying to please the majority. Look at it from BB's point of view - 5,000,000 viewers.. would they rather please 3,500,000 of them, or 1,500,000.

[Patty178]

Originally Posted by Dannyboii

See your other thread, in posted in that. What YOU want out of BB, differs to what the MAJORITY wants. 70% of people do not want to see bitching and arguing. 30% do.

70% of people might vote for BNP, it doesn't make you wrong for disliking them, nor does it make you wrong for complaining about them, but that is how democracy works. Its about trying to please the majority. Look at it from BB's point of view - 5,000,000 viewers.. would they rather please 3,500,000 of them, or 1,500,000.

What a stupid analogy lol

My proposal wasn't even voted on, so comparing it to tonights eviction is nonesense!

As for the BNP, how can you even imply the majority would vote them in any real numbers considering they don't even come close to even the Lib Dems (who are seen as a joke by most lol).

[Dannyboii]

Originally Posted by Patty178

What a stupid analogy lol

My proposal wasn't even voted on, so comparing it to tonights eviction is nonesense!

As for the BNP, how can you even imply the majority would vote them in any real numbers considering they don't even come close to even the Lib Dems (who are seen as a joke by most lol).

I didn't want to say Conservs, Libdem or Lab because I didn't want to start a politics war over '70% of people would never vote labour' or something like that. .

It is meant generally - 70% of people may vote for 'x' (I used BNP just to make things seem more logical, but feel free to use whatever you like).. it doesn't mean you are wrong about 'x', its doesn't neccesarily mean 'x' is best or even right, but it was a majority decision. Govan was a front runner for the 'bitching party' in the eviction 'election' and he didn't win.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

No1curs

[goonstock]

i gotta quit goin on this board during eviction night. completely spoiledddd

[Sabrewulf238]

Originally Posted by Patty178

This thread is so important and yet no one even reads it. Disgusting.

This thread isn't important in the slightest. It will fall down like any other thread, and get forgotten like any other thread.

[Jackie]

No not surprised at all.

[Peter Plunker]

Wow, Patty178 is a complete tool!

[jegmeister]

Originally Posted by Patty178

Yes you do. Your posts are cringeworthy to read and bring down the tone of the forum.

I should be careful if I were you. Insulting other Forum members is against the rules. Continue like this and I will report you