Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasown
Even rags come under privacy and libel laws, so there has to have been an interview. Journos for celebrity/gossip mags dont like going to jail for refusing to name sources in court.
Just because it is a sensationalist rag doesnt mean to say there isnt some truth in the article. It could all be true, most of it could be true or next to none of it could be true. You decide.
|
There is obviously a grain of truth in there somewhere. But the "interview" was probably a jotted-down conversation during a phone call. I decide, next to none of it is what was actually said.
Threaded Mode