[Grimnir]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It should be...this is an entertainment show, afterall. Where would we be without entertaining housemates?



Why not? If she was the most entertaining housemate, then she deserves to win...it's simple, really...

I dont watch it same way you do

I have never called it an entertainment show

its a socio-psycho type experiment show with people we hate, people we love and people we laugh at

I can choose my winner any way I want, not just who has been "entertaining"

[Raph]

Originally Posted by Grimnir

I dont watch it same way you do

I have never called it an entertainment show

its a socio-psycho type experiment show with people we hate, people we love and people we laugh at

I can choose my winner any way I want, not just who has been "entertaining"

This is exactly why Rachel Rice is a brilliant, brilliant winner.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Grimnir

I dont watch it same way you do

I have never called it an entertainment show

its a socio-psycho type experiment show with people we hate, people we love and people we laugh at

I can choose my winner any way I want, not just who has been "entertaining"

Err...but it is an entertainment show by default. Why do people watch TV? To be entertained, obviously...therefore it's an entertainment show. And the show would not be entertaining without entertaining housemates, i.e not the likes of Rachel Rice. You would think it's fairly self explanitory, Christ...

And yes, indeed you can. But if you chose to pick sh!t winners, then as long as you realise that you have contributed to Big Brother's axe, then is all is good - and you may give yourself a pat on the back.

A true Big Brother fan you are