[DDRickyDD]

Is Match Of The Day Fair and impartial in its coverage of the Premiership, or is it biased in favour of certain regions or teams?

[30stone]

Biased, they are usually loving certain teams.

Alan hansen is usually a dick toward Arsenal.

[MissKittyFantastico]

Totally.

Always put our games on last unless we play one of the big 4 and Hansen is one of the most biased. Don't really know why I watch it tbh, Football First is much better.

[MTVN]

Biased, West Ham normally just get a 2 minute slot at the very end of the program

[Locke.]

Man Utd and Chelsea always get a good 10-15 minute slot each, which is stupid it should be split evenly between teams, except for when games are 0-0.

[Novo]

The Top 4 mainly Chelsea, United, Arsenal, Tottenham should get the most time, they play the better football and that's what everyone wants to watch, who would want to watch Bolton v Stoke as the main highlight?

[Locke.]

Bolton's games are always more entertaining than Tottenham's, and it will be the same this week.

[Jayson]

It's very biased... although I suppose you need a little bias when it comes to the running order, the best sides deserve to be up first (apart from when the game is boring or has no goals) because they are usually the more entertaining.

But the little analysis at the end of each game is such bull**** sometimes. Hansen being the worst, of course. That's why nowadays I record MOTD and watch it the next morning so that I can fast forward through the analysis'.