[Vodka Drinka]

Originally Posted by lauraC

It was something that have never been discussed I don't think it was ever brought up in the other forum, it interests me and to be honest the child ben was talking about had me really quite upset, but later I thought maybe I was being naive and the child was really 30 years old, to which yeah I would find hilarious to be honest

You are now totally contradicting yourself, as you have done many times on this thread.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lauraC

I'm not deliberately ignoring you but was it who am I on digital spy? I'm not sure why it matters, I didn't post this thread there because I honestly don't think it is something that I personally want to bring up on a forum where people will take the piss out of ben and make judgements about his mum etc

How why would anyone make judgements on Ben's mother. What a ludicrious suggestion - and what on earth is the connection to his mother - none.

Besides which, that's not the reason you didn't put this subject up on DS. You know fine well that your inferrances were bordering on being close to libel, and they'd have been taken off the site as soon as you put them up, that's a bit closer to the truth - given that you were proven to be factaully incorrect in your opening post and subsequent posts. Indeed, any hard hitting questions put to you, you simply could not answer.

DS are very sensitive to being open to lawsuits. The fact that your first post made mention of this being a 'private place' - when in fact, it's on webland and is accessible - shows you didn't want it aired to a wider audience, as you had nothing to back up your story telling.

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by pices

Ben is not attracted to old ladies though, what do you define as old?I think most of the ladies he dates are of his own age or less, the fact that he accompanied some older ladies to posh events is neither here nor there, though as an older lady myself i can see why anyone would want Bens company at such places.

Why get your mind in such a muddle anyhow wondering what someone elses preferences are, its not something I would concern myself with tbh unless it looked dubious or illegal, whatever this 8 year old child did.....and lets face it at the age of eight it would not be likely to be of a sexual nature, why does it as you say 'not sit well with you' why are you concerned at all with boarding schools, replacement mummies, or adult fetish.
have you had a bad boarding school experience yourself on which you are deflecting on to someone else.
I dont ever get bored talking about housemates I wish to discuss, if I did I would not be discussing them.

60? that's the age a "close friend" told the tabloids
The kid (if there was one) was obviously deprived of a childhood and looking for comfort from a time when he was at home in nappies with his mother ( my Freudian guess)

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Suze

Hi Vicky. Thank you for clarifying a few things Much appreciated. Although some stuff posted by one poster in particular is imo verging on libellous and surely that should be enough to close a thread when that happens?

I fail to see how speculating on a comment that was made is libelous...I may be missing the point entirely though :/

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

How why would anyone make judgements on Ben's mother. What a ludicrious suggestion - and what on earth is the connection to his mother - none.

Besides which, that's not the reason you didn't put this subject up on DS. You know fine well that your inferrances were bordering on being close to libel, and they'd have been taken off the site as soon as you put them up, that's a bit closer to the truth - given that you were proven to be factaully incorrect in your opening post and subsequent posts. Indeed, any hard hitting questions put to you, you simply could not answer.

DS are very sensitive to being open to lawsuits. The fact that your first post made mention of this being a 'private place' - when in fact, it's on webland and is accessible - shows you didn't want it aired to a wider audience, as you had nothing to back up your story telling.

you have read DS before, you know how people are

[Vodka Drinka]

Originally Posted by lauraC

60? that's the age a "close friend" told the tabloids
The kid (if there was one) was obviously deprived of a childhood and looking for comfort from a time when he was at home in nappies with his mother ( my Freudian guess)

Ben's never dated a 60 year old, so stop telling porkies please.

[Suze]

Originally Posted by lauraC

I'm not deliberately ignoring you but was it who am I on digital spy? I'm not sure why it matters, I didn't post this thread there because I honestly don't think it is something that I personally want to bring up on a forum where people will take the piss out of ben and make judgements about his mum etc

Thank you for your reply. However my post didn't just touch on those two things. It doesn't matter who you are on DS, but you brought up your were a member there not me, so I was just being inquisitive as to who you were? I don't mind anyone knowing who I was on DS or other BB forums if I posted on any others which I don't. I am not ashamed of many BB posts of mine on DS. I posted as Susann there until I asked for my account to be deactivated. As for yourself not posting there for the above you mentioned, sorry but that reads as a flimsy, what should it matter re threads there, that is what they have admin and mods for, and how do you know Ben will get pulled apart? or his mum? As it is you insinuating stuff that I outlined in my previous post to you. Are you maybe more worried about DS picking up on stuff you post on the subject and other members responses?

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Vodka Drinka

Ben's never dated a 60 year old, so stop telling porkies please.

That's what a "close friend" told the tabloids, ben often mentioned his attraction to older woman in the house

[pices]

Originally Posted by lauraC

I'm not deliberately ignoring you but was it who am I on digital spy? I'm not sure why it matters, I didn't post this thread there because I honestly don't think it is something that I personally want to bring up on a forum where people will take the piss out of ben and make judgements about his mum etc

Why should anyone make judgements about Bens mother???

this is becoming totally ridiculous now, how have we gone from Ben told a story about a childhood friend of 8 years old to Ben needing a mother replacement, his Mother being a bad one and Ben having Sexual fetishes, I think you are seriously stepping over the mark of decency tbh,you and moleymo are obsessed with Bens sexual preferences, why? whats it to you what someones preferences are.

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Suze

Thank you for your reply. However my post didn't just touch on those two things. It doesn't matter who you are on DS, but you brought up your were a member there not me, so I was just being inquisiotive as to who you were? I don't mind anyone knowing who I was on DS or other BB forums if I posted on any others which I don't. I am not ashamed of many BB posts of mine on DS. I posted as Susann there until I asked for my account to be deactivated. As for yourself not posting there for the above you mentioned, sorry but that reads as a flimsy, what should it matter re threads there, that is what they have admin and mods for, and how do you know Ben will get pulled apart? or his mum? As it is you insinuating stuff that I outlined in my previous post to you. Are you maybe more worried about DS picking up on stuff you post on the subject and other members responses?

so why don't you post it there if you are confident that ben will not be laughed at and his family disected

[Vodka Drinka]

Originally Posted by lauraC

That's what a "close friend" told the tabloids, ben often mentioned his attraction to older woman in the house

OK then, why don't you provide us with a link to that story?

He might like older women, lots of young men do. But I've always assumed it to be women in their 30's and 40's.

The older woman he had an affair with was actually 42, which really isn't that much older than him when you think about it.

Anyway does it really bloody matter at the end of the day?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lauraC

It was something that have never been discussed I don't think it was ever brought up in the other forum, it interests me and to be honest the child ben was talking about had me really quite upset, but later I thought maybe I was being naive and the child was really 30 years old, to which yeah I would find hilarious to be honest

It is something that interests you, a supposed discussion that was on Big Brother ove 5months ago, so interested you were that you never thought to discuss it at any time it 'supposedly' happened on BB?

let's not kid on here, you started this thread in an attempt to make it look as though Ben had some weird kinky thing going on with nappies - when in fact, all Ben had done was relay a story about a friend of his - a friend was was merely a little boy, all of 8 years old at the time.

The thread was started with very ill intent - it's a bit late in the day to pretend it was anything else - for you to now type up that 'the child Ben was talking about that upset you', - what a lot of tosh - you have spent pages upon pages on this very thread, arguing till you were blue in the face, that it was Ben that was at the heart of the story - so much that (remember) you 'swore it was the truth, on your mother's life'.

It's not smart, and it's not clever. it's also completely transparent.

[Suze]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I fail to see how speculating on a comment that was made is libelous...I may be missing the point entirely though :/

Maybe this is all getting out of hand, another reason this thread may have run it's course maybe? But in a post a few pages back there was no speculation, it was being classed as proof and truth.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

How why would anyone make judgements on Ben's mother. What a ludicrious suggestion - and what on earth is the connection to his mother - none.

Besides which, that's not the reason you didn't put this subject up on DS. You know fine well that your inferrances were bordering on being close to libel, and they'd have been taken off the site as soon as you put them up, that's a bit closer to the truth - given that you were proven to be factaully incorrect in your opening post and subsequent posts. Indeed, any hard hitting questions put to you, you simply could not answer.

DS are very sensitive to being open to lawsuits. The fact that your first post made mention of this being a 'private place' - when in fact, it's on webland and is accessible - shows you didn't want it aired to a wider audience, as you had nothing to back up your story telling.

Originally Posted by lauraC

you have read DS before, you know how people are

And what about the rest of my post Laura. Any chance of addressing that at all.....!

[Suze]

Originally Posted by lauraC

so why don't you post it there if you are confident that ben will not be laughed at and his family disected

I made it quite clear in this thread to the post you have just replied to that I asked for my account to be deactivated there. Plus I have not seen the nappy converesation nor would it interest me to post it up. You started such a thread and mentioned DS, remember.

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

It is something that interests you, a supposed discussion that was on Big Brother ove 5months ago, so interested you were that you never thought to discuss it at any time it 'supposedly' happened on BB?

let's not kid on here, you started this thread in an attempt to make it look as though Ben had some weird kinky thing going on with nappies - when in fact, all Ben had done was relay a story about a friend of his - a friend was was merely a little boy, all of 8 years old at the time.

The thread was started with very ill intent - it's a bit late in the day to pretend it was anything else - for you to now type up that 'the child Ben was talking about that upset you', - what a lot of tosh - you have spent pages upon pages on this very thread, arguing till you were blue in the face, that it was Ben that was at the heart of the story - so much that (remember) you 'swore it was the truth, on your mother's life'.

It's not smart, and it's not clever. it's also completely transparent.

when ben told the story I was actually a big fan and it did make me sad, it was only later after loads of massive bitch fests I actually went off ben so you are wrong!

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Suze

I made it quite clear in this thread that I asked for my account to be deactivated there. Plus I have not seen the nappy converesation nor would it interest me to post it up. You started such a thread and mentioned DS, remember.

why did you ask to be deactivated?

[patsylimerick]

Whew.......that took a while to get through! I never attended boarding school, but my husband did and so did his siblings. His lot are a little more reserved than our lot, but much more independent, calm and measured, IMO. That's my near-personal knowledge of the subject and I wouldn't dream in 15 million years of judging any parents' decision in this regard. I'm flabbergasted that posters think its OK to be making the kind of tenuous amateur psychology connections that have been made in this thread. Flabbergasted.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I fail to see how speculating on a comment that was made is libelous...I may be missing the point entirely though :/

In fairness - if you read through from page 1, you will find that Laura was arguing on pretty near knuckle things about Ben and was saying it waws the absolute truth etc, the recent posts that are now being put up - completely are in total contrast to what was being put up yesterday from page one onwards - total contrast.

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

And what about the rest of my post Laura. Any chance of addressing that at all.....!

I think you are talking a load of baloney with the libel talk, Ben told the story not me i'm only commenting on it, I find the libel talk funny and a little desperate

[Suze]

Originally Posted by lauraC

why did you ask to be deactivated?

I will reply to you that answer in the same light if you choose to say who you post as there? After all, as you so rightly said to me, what interest is your username there, so what interest is my reason for deactivation to you then?

[lauraC]

Originally Posted by Suze

I will reply to you that answer in the same light if you choose to say who you post as there? After all, as you so rightly said to me, what interest is your username there, so what interest is my reason for deactivation to you then?

touché

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lauraC

when ben told the story I was actually a big fan and it did make me sad, it was only later after loads of massive bitch fests I actually went off ben so you are wrong!

That does not explain why you have gone to such lengths on this thread to start nothing but malicious gossip spreading on a Housemate, based on utter fabrication, from page one onwards - your posts today are backtracking like nothing I have ever seen before.

[Vodka Drinka]

Originally Posted by lauraC

I think you are talking a load of baloney with the libel talk, Ben told the story not me i'm only commenting on it, I find the libel talk funny and a little desperate

The only person talking baloney is you, as always!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lauraC

I think you are talking a load of baloney with the libel talk, Ben told the story not me i'm only commenting on it, I find the libel talk funny and a little desperate

Ben told a story that bears absolutely no relation to what you claimed was the absolute truth yesterday. It's here on this thread for everyone to see!