[Zippy]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes well Shifty bloke,
Of Course after a while they may let him go if her did not do it.

He looks like a retired old ******. Can't imagine he attacked her for sexual reasons. Maybe she was behind with rent or something?

Of course, he could be entirely innocent.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Zippy

He looks like a retired old ******. Can't imagine he attacked her for sexual reasons. Maybe she was behind with rent or something?

Of course, he could be entirely innocent.

There's a part of me that thinks he isn't the guy. Sure he looks a bit odd, but I'm not so sure it is him....... guess we'll find out soon enough though.

[keithafc]

I bet it was the dad who did it(just putting it out there..). He didn't want her daughter back, he wanted his daughters body back...

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by keithafc

I bet it was the dad who did it(just putting it out there..). He didn't want her daughter back, he wanted his daughters body back...

I'm not entirely sure this is a situation that merits having the piss taken out of it. Just putting it out there.....


I hadn't realised that the police had taken two vehicles away:-

Sky reported that two cars have been taken away by police - one, the Chrysler, was described as belonging to Mr Jeffries - the report did not say to whom the second, a Volvo, belonged.

Having seen the clip of the Landlord telling reporters that what he had said to police had been very distorted - it's interesting to see this snippet from Sky News:-

Sky News' crime correspondent Martin Brunt, in Bristol, said that after Jefferies had spoken to Sky News there were questions surrounding his claim.

"I think he first told neighbours that he thought he had seen Miss Yeates leaving with two people before he spoke to the police, but when we spoke to him he seemed rather vague about the details," he said.
"It then became a bit of mystery and it almost was a case of things not adding up."

The man apparently said to neighbours that he thought. The Sky reporter reports that he (the reporter), 'thinks' he first told neighbours. The reporter is basing his report on suppositions.

Given that Mr Jeffries clearly is very educated as far as the English language and its usage is concerned, given that it is his forte - he would be very aware of his wording, it's context, the delivery etc, and most likely, would be very precise about the wording he used - makes me wonder if they are all barking up the wrong tree with this guy. The plot thickens.....