[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Omah

I used inverted commas to generalise - "celebrities" may include Elvis to Amy, Princess Diana to Jade Goody, James Dean to River Phoenix, etc, etc, etc .....

Elvis was far more than a celebrity and it's absurd for you to use that as comparison.

Princess Diana was part of the Royal Family - a whole different ball game. Not a known drugs user or heavy drinker as far as I recall.

James Dean was reknown in the acting world.

I don't think you are comparing on any favourable (or fair) level Omah. TBH, I'm starting to dislike the manner in which you are trying to turn this thread: from a discussion thread into a 'tit for tat' one. It comes across (imo) as you doing more gloating than discussing. I did agree with your comments regarding the 'view count' but given the posts you are putting up since that point, as I say, I'm not entirely convinced it is discussion you want.

Sorry Omah, you may not be gloating - all I am saying is that is the way I am seeing how your posts may be coming across.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Elvis was far more than a celebrity and it's absurd for you to use that as comparison.

Princess Diana was part of the Royal Family - a whole different ball game. Not a known drugs user or heavy drinker as far as I recall.

James Dean was reknown in the acting world.

I don't think you are comparing on any favourable (or fair) level Omah. TBH, I'm starting to dislike the manner in which you are trying to turn this thread: from a discussion thread into a 'tit for tat' one. It comes across (imo) as you doing more gloating than discussing. I did agree with your comments regarding the 'view count' but given the posts you are putting up since that point, as I say, I'm not entirely convinced it is discussion you want.

Sorry Omah, you may not be gloating - all I am saying is that is the way I am seeing how your posts may be coming across.

It seems to ME that you are being personal, judgemental and patronising ..... tut, tut .....

I note that YOUR post count on this thread is higher than mine, in fact, highest, of all ..... and, given that most of my posts are links and yours are opinions, you are coming across as a bit of a bully .....

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Omah

It seems to me that you are being personal, judgemental and patronising ..... tut, tut .....

No. I'm being very honest Omah. It seems you are more interested in putting up newspaper articles than actully debating. That doesn't require me to be personal, judgmental or patronising - I said that it comes across as you gloating. I didn't say you were - it is however, how it appears to come across to me. That's my opinion on your posts of late

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

No. I'm being very honest Omah. It seems you are more interested in putting up newspaper articles than actully debating. That doesn't require me to be personal, judgmental or patronising - I said that it comes across as you gloating. I didn't say you were - it is however, how it appears to come across to me. That's my opinion on your posts of late

You are, of course, entitled to an opinion .....

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Omah

It seems to ME that you are being personal, judgemental and patronising ..... tut, tut .....

I note that YOUR post count on this thread is higher than mine, in fact, highest, of all ..... and, given that most of my posts are links and yours are opinions, you are coming across as a bit of a bully .....

. I've contributed plenty to this thread - by way of discussion - not just chucking up newspaper articles. That's not bulllying either - that's a fact.

Yeah..bullies tend to say things like this: Get a grip Omah

Sorry Omah, you may not be gloating - all I am saying is that is the way I am seeing how your posts may be coming across.