[Locke.]

What does he do? He is just a paprazzi isn't he?

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Locke.

What does he do? He is just a paprazzi isn't he?

He runs a company that pays paps for photographs in a nutshell. Then he sells them to the highest bidder (newspaper/magazine)

[Locke.]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

He runs a company that pays paps for photographs in a nutshell. Then he sells them to the highest bidder (newspaper/magazine)

Don't really see what the problem is then

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Locke.

Don't really see what the problem is then

I think it's as thats where he started. Being a pap. Plus he's in the whole pap business. I do hate what paps do to people but at the same time not one of these people would be famous without them

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

I think it's as thats where he started. Being a pap. Plus he's in the whole pap business. I do hate what paps do to people but at the same time not one of these people would be famous without them

anybody who saw the Tv series on them knows how nasty and harrassing they can be. They stalk celebs and obstruct their paths whilst often making nasty comments just to get a reaction. They can be truly vile.

There really should be laws against some of them because no normal person is allowed to harrass people like that.

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Zippy

anybody who saw the Tv series on them knows how nasty and harrassing they can be. They stalk celebs and obstruct their paths whilst often making nasty comments just to get a reaction. They can be truly vile.

There really should be laws against some of them because no normal person is allowed to harrass people like that.

But where would "celebs" be without them? Yes I 100% agree with the invasion of privacy thing. But it's a two way street with so many of them. Kerry, Amy, Katie, Peter - they'd be nowhere and if you want to delve further and further where would TV be? Without us knowing what "celebs" are doing?

So yes, it makes me sick to my stomach asto what they do. But I see a bigger picture too

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

But where would "celebs" be without them? Yes I 100% agree with the invasion of privacy thing. But it's a two way street with so many of them. Kerry, Amy, Katie, Peter - they'd be nowhere and if you want to delve further and further where would TV be? Without us knowing what "celebs" are doing?

So yes, it makes me sick to my stomach asto what they do. But I see a bigger picture too

but they can get what they want from each other without the nasty harrassment. Indeed, PR companies and the tabloids are in close contact and set up numerous stories.

But there's a line and nobody deserves to be stalked and harrassed. Thats criminal behaviour. Nobody signs up for that.

Plus, just because your job is acting or modelling it does not make you fair game. Not all celebs seek attention from the tabloids. They just do their job and go home. Also, sports stars are famous as a result of being great at what they do. Again, they dont always seek any fame or tabloid attention so shouldnt be fair game either.

But the likes of Andre who use the media shamelessly are certainly fair game. But theyre a minority. Classy stars dont need or want tabloid attention.