[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by MPVS

What a ridiculous post.

Aaron said No not once but twice. He was actively against the decision. He was essentially beyond redemption. So of course they would go on without him! Some people are not selfish, some people actually want to be charitable and give their friends gifts on their birthdays. I am surprised that in today's society, being charitable is seen with eyes of suspicion. How about for once acknowledging that what Jay and Louise did was NICE? How about actually rewarding kindness, which is so lacking in today's society? Why do you people consistently defend one of the meanest housemates in there, Aaron? You people are a sad reflection of today's society if you think Aaron is a worthy winner.

Louise actually has to be one of the friendliest and nicest housemates in there. She has never gone out of the way to sabotage tasks, she's never tried to be rude or cruel to anyone. She has never let things get to her to the point where it brings everyone down. She and Jay were nice enough to actually take 500 POUNDS off their winnings to give it to their fellow friends! They have ALWAYS given others the benefit of the doubt even when it's been lacking from others!

And suddenly you turn around and attack them for actually doing something nice? I am utterly disgusted at people that cannot give credit where it's due.

Erm Jay & Louise also said no TWICE! They ALL agreed it was too much & they didn't want to buy them presents, not just Aaron... They then sneaked back in there, behind Aaron's back, & bought them a £500 present each & Louise repeatedly told them how much they had spent on them!

That doesn't sound like a lovely, selfless act to me...