[jo1791]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

if you trusted someone who short changed a blind woman to split 30k, you need your head screwing on a bit better

That was a shocker!!!

If she wants any kind of career in the public eye, which I can only presume she does by appearing on BB, then she is doing herself no favours by not splitting the money. Not good pr!

I don't care whether she does or not but it is a valid topic of discussion.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Wee bit of respect btw wouldn't go amiss when you're addressing another poster: no common sense required for that - just a little thing known as common courtesy.

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by jo1791

That was a shocker!!!

If she wants any kind of career in the public eye, which I can only presume she does by appearing on BB, then she is doing herself no favours by not splitting the money. Not good pr!

I don't care whether she does or not but it is a valid topic of discussion.

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given.

I'm not talking about the forum.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

How would you have done that exactly?

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

You both need to accept that I have my own thought processes .....whether you like it or not - just as you both have yours. It's served me well over the past 46 years, so I'll stick to how I work.

Wee bit of respect btw wouldn't go amiss when you're addressing another poster: no common sense required for that - just a little thing known as common courtesy.

It seems that your thought processes take you all around the houses, just trying to 'simplify' things for you.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

How would you have done that exactly?

none of your business.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

I'm not talking about the forum.

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

none of your business.

pmsl!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

It seems that your thought processes take you all around the houses, just trying to 'simplify' things for you.

Kind offer but no need. Certainly no need when the housemates didn't keep to their word.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

You are doing the same thing. Why won't you comment on what Tom said? because it shoots your theory down. They don't have to show how the whole deal on the HL. It was spelled out. Tom made it perfectly clear when he made his statement and they all agreed and then he made the statement again.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

You are doing the same thing. Why won't you comment on what Tom said? because it shoots your theory down. They don't have to show how the whole deal on the HL. It was spelled out. Tom made it perfectly clear when he made his statement and they all agreed and then he made the statement again.

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

[BBfan6418]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.
Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.
That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

No one is forcing you to do anything. I provided facts to back up my comments.

You have been debating over ifs and buts the whole season. We were only given a 45 min edited HL show to watch. so a lot of discussions took place off camera.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by BBfan6418

No one is forcing you to do anything. I provided facts to back up my comments.

You have been debating over ifs and buts the whole season. We were only given a 45 min edited HL show to watch. so a lot of discussions took place off camera.

None of which negates my own right to offer my own view on the easiest way for the money to have been split - which is what you are disputing.

As I said, not that matters because Alex very much appears to have renaiged on her deal with the others.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Kind offer but no need. Certainly no need when the housemates didn't keep to their word.

Take the 's' from housemates and you are nearly there.

Alex has the Ł30k which needs spitting, Jay has already split his money with Louise!!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Take the 's' from housemates and you are nearly there.

Alex has the Ł30k which needs spitting, Jay has already split his money with Louise!!

I will see it as I chose to, not how you decide I should.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

Seeing as Jay has already given Ł5k to Louise the only person who can physically split any monies is Alex so how could they have all not kept to the agreement? It is only Alex who needs to do anything!


I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Anybody with common sense would see sense...

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

Plenty has been said in the media, Alex said herself on OKTV that she would be splitting her share accordingly... FACTs like this should not be ignored!!

Fact is only Alex and Jay had to share, Jay has done so with Louise so it is up to Alex to do the rest. All this talk about having to pool the money is nonsensical!!

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

None of which negates my own right to offer my own view on the easiest way for the money to have been split - which is what you are disputing.

As I said, not that matters because Alex very much appears to have renaiged on her deal with the others.

OMG well done!! WE have arrived!!

Thank you yes, Alex went back on the deal!!

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I will see it as I chose to, not how you decide I should.

Choose to, not chose to!!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Fact is only Alex and Jay had to share, Jay has done so with Louise so it is up to Alex to do the rest. All this talk about having to pool the money is nonsensical!!

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

I've quoted my post above - rather than the 'amended' / 'altered' version you put up.

Look, you can argue till the cows come home. I have my view on it. You have yours - and we disagree. That's it in a nutshell.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

OMG well done!! WE have arrived!!

Thank you yes, Alex went back on the deal!!

forgive me here, but isn't the thread about ALEX .....

Originally Posted by jo1791

Choose to, not chose to!!

Good god.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I've quoted my post above - rather than the 'amended' / 'altered' version you put up.

Look, you can argue till the cows come home. I have my view on it. You have yours - and we disagree. That's it in a nutshell.

Can't argue with FACTS.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

forgive me here, but isn't the thread about ALEX .....

Yes it is, on how Alex has gone back on the deal, no one else

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Can't argue with FACTS.

Originally Posted by jo1791

Yes it is, on how Alex has gone back on the deal, no one else

You're boring me to death now.