[starry]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Ahhh this old chestnut again.

And a crock of **** too.

Rachel rice was pretty, sophie reade can hardly be described as 'not too good looking'...kate lawler was pretty too. Women such as Makosi have made it very late on too...and makosi was stunning, and intelligent(which is usually the other accusation, women only like ugly stupid women)

Seriously people need to quit with the blanket generalizations tbh. Its really quite insulting.


Oh, and out of the male winners...I wouldnt say any were especially goodlooking, bar aaron last year either. Usually the goodlooking men they put in there are absolute arseholes.

I've been through all this before with you for sure.

But Kate was a tomboy, Rachel was alright but no glamour model, Sophie WAS a glamour model however she became Dogface and her hair was a mess so she became more acceptable to people.

As for the looks of male winners that's a matter of opinion. But some definitely thought at least Pete and Anthony were attractive in some way. Looks help with both sexes in this show though as I said in my first remark. Generalisations aren't perfect of course and some will think differently than the rest, but I think there is some pattern.