[Wayne-Kerr]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I'll add patronsing to your list shall I.

This is quite patronising...

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Therein lies the difference between you and I Jack. I don't have a problem (like you have) with anyone if the choose to thoroughly dislike someone else, and in this case, a two bit celeb.

As for my being brought up to think a certain way: it's clear that you have no idea what you are speaking of. You have no iota of knowledge as to how I have lived my life, or how I was brought up. Apart from which: that was decades ago: being an adult and mature woman, I managed to form my own opinions independently long before you were even a twinkle in your mother's eye.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Wayne-Kerr

This is quite patronising...

Nope... go read the post that of JACK's that I quoted when I used those words. . HE said he had a problem with..... I quoted his very own words.


The latter was factual.... ie: this part. Not patronisng. but factual. Have a good old long hard think about what it means.....

Apart from which: that was decades ago: being an adult and mature woman, I managed to form my own opinions independently long before you were even a twinkle in your mother's eye

Better luck next time Wayne-Kerr.

[Incensed]

for the life of me , I cannot see what you've actually contributed in respect of the thread subject Incensed over the past few pages.

Really? I can't see what you have either! C'est la vie!!

[Wayne-Kerr]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Nope... go read the post that of JACK's that I quoted when I used those words. . HE said he had a problem with..... I quoted his very own words.


The latter was factual.... ie: this part. Not patronisng. but factual. Have a good old long hard think about what it means.....

Apart from which: that was decades ago: being an adult and mature woman, I managed to form my own opinions independently long before you were even a twinkle in your mother's eye

Better luck next time Wayne-Kerr.

Factual maybe, but when used in an attempt to patronise someone, it becomes factual and patronising.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Wayne-Kerr

Factual maybe, but when used in an attempt to patronise someone, it becomes factual and patronising.

Perhaps in your mind. Not in mine. Funny how you STILL continue to refuse to discuss the topic of the thread though eh.

[Wayne-Kerr]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Perhaps in your mind. Not in mine. Funny how you STILL continue to refuse to discuss the topic of the thread though eh.

That's fine, be patronising, but as long as you're not actually being patronising in your own mind, it's fine. Carry on!

And I haven't refused, I've discussed it twice already. But you're obviously of a fixed mind set, so I don't see the point in re-discussing.

[threedoggies]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Nope... go read the post that of JACK's that I quoted when I used those words. . HE said he had a problem with..... I quoted his very own words.


The latter was factual.... ie: this part. Not patronisng. but factual. Have a good old long hard think about what it means.....

Apart from which: that was decades ago: being an adult and mature woman, I managed to form my own opinions independently long before you were even a twinkle in your mother's eye

Better luck next time Wayne-Kerr.

So Wayne-Kerr is continuing his argumentative ways in here since he has been banned on DS

[Wayne-Kerr]

Originally Posted by threedoggies

So Wayne-Kerr is continuing his argumentative ways in here since he has been banned on DS

I wasn't banned, I asked to have my account banned permenantly (so I was banned, but not in that way )

[arista]

Originally Posted by Wayne-Kerr

I wasn't banned, I asked to have my account banned permenantly (so I was banned, but not in that way )

Spiffing

[Suze]

Originally Posted by Wayne-Kerr

I wasn't banned, I asked to have my account banned permenantly (so I was banned, but not in that way )

Not to go too much off topic and mention DS bans at all, but just to state, an account is not asked by a member there to have banned. I know, I was a member there since Ovtober 2002, and chose to have my account there deactivated, which they will do if asked and will delete your posts also if asked as far as I am aware, if a poster there has banned in their profile, it is simply that, because they have been banned, not asked to be banned, no other reason at all.

[Suze]

I have read through some posts, and have to agree with the couple of posters who see Mids as being ganged up on by a few, it is not nice and not clever imo, we should be able to debate this thread topic no matter what views we hold, and able to debate fairly reasonably also.

So on the subject of the topic, I would like to say, my opinion of Denise W, seems to have been right in my opinion, she took quite a few in with some of the best acting she has done to date, and no I am not referring to peeps on here but a lot of the viewing and voting public in general imho.