FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: is horrible history a correct subject to have on morning news ? | ||||||
yes - its great and they are getting history across brilliantly. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 40.00% | |||
|
||||||
no - its terrible and a silly way to teach history. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
history should be tacht with only telling facts and no humour. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
joe - your poems will never go down in history. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 60.00% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
My young brother watches that series and loves it. I personally don't think they have the right balance of humour and seriousness, but it does cover the curriculum quite well.
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|