[swinearefine]

Originally Posted by SoBig

Are you really going to argue that Danielle wasn't a great great player? She lost because there wasn't a jury house back then. Just that simple. No one knew the extent of how she was playing them. No one. Even after they were voted out, they still had no clue. After she played Marcellas a lot of people turned on her even more so. They all were like how can a wife and mother be so nice in the house, but be so ruthless when it came to the game? Truth is half of the people that won BB wouldn't have won if there weren't a jury house.

Everyone knows Danielle should have won that season.

Danielle was good, but she had some major flaws in her game, which is why she didn't win. The winner isn't who you personally want to win; it's who the jury wants to win, and Danielle alienated the jury with her Diary Room entries. It was a horrible mistake to not sequester the jury, but Danielle knew that they would see every one of her Diary Room entries, and she could be quite bitchy and mean in them. And she never would have beaten Jason in the final two, so I don't know what she was thinking there.

Good player? Yes. Legendary houseguest? Yes. Deserved to win? I think the jury has already answered that.