[Jimrod]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

He STILL had the series highest % FACT ,spin it as much as you want, you cannot change FACTS

And Gary Glitter would probably get a higher % than Hitler. Doesn't mean he's popular.

Percentage is no indication of popularity of people in the house (vs all the others in the house) unless everyone is up for eviction the same week. But then I'm sure you understand this and are just trolling as usual... If you actually believe what you say then I guess that shows something about the intellectual level of debate you're capable of.

[Jords]

People still arguing over Deana

Legendary HM!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Jimrod

And Gary Glitter would probably get a higher % than Hitler. Doesn't mean he's popular.

Percentage is no indication of popularity of people in the house (vs all the others in the house) unless everyone is up for eviction the same week. But then I'm sure you understand this and are just trolling as usual... If you actually believe what you say then I guess that shows something about the intellectual level of debate you're capable of.

With full and total respect I diasagree with so little information from BB.

By your logic then, Deana's very large result against Lydia is also virtually meaningless too if percentages are that unimportant.
Since although it's true that Conor and Deana never had a head to head so we cannot compare that,Conor also had a very large near 65% win over both Lydia and Victoria in the first 3 way eviction or is that another eviction battle that is meaningless because Conor won it?
Also, presumably, you do actually know the actual totals of all votes cast in each eviction to be able to say the percentages are meaningless.

[Apple202]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

With full and total respect I diasagree with so little information from BB.

By your logic then, Deana's very large result against Lydia is also virtually meaningless too if percentages are that unimportant.
Since although it's true that Conor and Deana never had a head to head so we cannot compare that,Conor also had a very large near 65% win over both Lydia and Victoria in the first 3 way eviction or is that another eviction battle that is meaningless because Conor won it?
Also, presumably, you do actually know the actual totals of all votes cast in each eviction to be able to say the percentages are meaningless.

We can say what would happen in a Deana vs. Conor eviction, seen as though she got double his votes in the four way. She would have completely annihilated him into oblivion. He got 80% because it was white man v. black woman.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Apple202

We can say what would happen in a Deana vs. Conor eviction, seen as though she got double his votes in the four way. She would have completely annihilated him into oblivion. He got 80% because it was white man v. black woman.

You can guess what may have happened you cannot say for sure.Head to heads can bring about very different results.

Hence my point, as to Conor and Shievonne,if the public and people really wanted him out for whatever, then all they had to do was vote for Shievonne but people didn't do that,so what happened to the massive anti Conor brigade that was supposed to exist.

Equally so, I would guess,not say for sure,that in a head to head with Conor,Deana likely would have won it, however those who really disliked Deana in that head to head would have only needed to vote Conor to get her out too.
Many supporters of many other housemates did not care for Deana,that could have played a major part as to what may have happened in a head to head between them.

Nothing likely certain at all.
For instance also in the 4 way eviction Arron only got 12.8% of the vote, had Arron not been up that week those votes may have gone to Conor.They for sure would not have gone to Becky or Deana.