[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Nedusa

Interesting Post comparing The CBB HM to the accused in a court of law (a Jury court) , the parallels are there although the accuseds past record is not allowed to be disclosed to the Jury if it does not have any direct relevance to the case in question, as that could prejudice the jury.

The case with Danica is interesting as she admitted her seedy livelihood and I think the court of CBB's viewers are trying to decide how to interpret her actions. Does she prostitute herself - Yes she sells sexual services for money, Is she a Prostitute - Maybe, as technically she does not engage in sexual acts with Clients (to our knowledge).Its a tough one to call, and I think it may come down to personal values and beliefs.

I personally find her actions immoral,illegal,immature and would have no hesitation in calling her a *****, in fact as I've stated in previous posts she is committing in my mind a criminal act of fraud by conning/scammng vulnerable lonely people out of their hard earned cash. I would like to see her behind bars.

The other HM's I tend to agree with your sentiments.

Finally as regards other Posters who take an opposite view then OK fine i'm happy to hear their arguement, but I think we need to defend our corner as our views are reasonably well conceived and require defending/explaining. I don't subscribe however for the discussion to become a personal attack on other posters who do not share my view.

I will explain my point to the very best of my abilty and then if we end up in a stalemate, I would reluctantly agree to differ.

OMG Nedusa, I used to think you were a self righteous prat but Ive changed my mind now, I really like you now. What a lovely retort. good on you mate and congrats on a well constructed post as well.