[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

yes, I noted your correction.

Joey: a poster cannot decide they want to raise a thread based on their own predicament and share that with everyone as you have alluded to and then start taking offence - when they have chosen to bring themselves into it personally. Either Kate wishes this thread to discuss her own predicament, or the discussion is a general one for those it may affect. If it is down to discussing and sharing one members predicament as you have inferred here: then that allows ALL members to contribute - not only the ones that are all in agreement.

Perhaps someone can clarify - are we discussing a general Government proposal and how it will affect those GENERALLY in a particular situation.

Give it a rest Pyra, and stop having digs at me in your replies to other people. Yes we are discussing the policy in general, but people will always relate it to how it affects them personally, which is more than fine, it moves the discussion on and I am happy to divulge my personal circumstances, I just don't expect to be knocked for them. As I've stated several times on here, I have been employed all my working life since leaving school, so the implication that I'm a sponger isn't welcome, please stop it. However, you are hellbent on hammering the point home that people in social housing who are out of work aren't even fit to be called working class, out of your own mouth came the words, so don't try to back track please.