[Matt]

Seeing as this debate has erupted tonight, I want to gauge the forum's opinions in a pollular form.

Should the TiBB Razzie Awards (the negative awards - Most Argumentative, Most Self-Obsessed etc) have an opt-out list, so you can abstain from taking part if you so wish?

[Mystic Mock]

No it takes the fun out of the game.

[InOne]

No, everyone should be included. If people start opting out then we'll most likely have crap winners

[Black Dagger]

No.

[Jack_]

In the words of Patrick, ***** up or ***** off.

[Ramsay]

Noooooooooooooo

[Smithy]

no

[Kizzy]

No.... But the nominations should not be anonymous.
Otherwise it's just a witchhunt for some.
Ain't nobody got time for that!

[Smithy]

Shoulda been a public poll

[Glenn.]

What's the point in having the Razzie Awards if people are going to opt out

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by kizzy

No.... But the nominations should not be anonymous.
Otherwise it's just a witchhunt for some.
Ain't nobody got time for that!

Exactly this.

[InOne]

If noms weren't anon it would end up a lot lot worse

[Black Dagger]

People would only complain that 'said person' has it out for them even if it wasn't anonymous... so really it'd be a no win-win...

The Razzie's aren't broken, let's not try to fix them.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by kizzy

No.... But the nominations should not be anonymous.
Otherwise it's just a witchhunt for some.
Ain't nobody got time for that!

So you think Members should see who's being horrible to them? what if they've got loads of nominations aswell it would be cruel.

[Marsh.]

^^^ But I thought you said it's not being horrible, it's just light hearted?

Can't have it both ways.

[Brother Leon]

I like the unanonymous idea

[Marsh.]

^^^ But I thought you said it's not being horrible, it's just light hearted?

Can't have it both ways.

[Joe.]

I voted yes because I wanted to be different.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

^^^ But I thought you said it's not being horrible, it's just light hearted?

Can't have it both ways.

Im on about that if members are going to be horrible they will be anonymous or not anonymous, what should happen is that you can't have award nominations that are really cruel like "Who's The Ugliest Member Award".

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

^^^ But I thought you said it's not being horrible, it's just light hearted?

Can't have it both ways.

I'm not the one being sensitive...

I'd find it flattering if the same person nominated me for every award...

I just don't think that members have strong enough skin to deal with knowing who's nominated them for these awards... despite it being just harmless.

I've gave my POV though.

Oh I didn't see Mockinator posted above me and you directed that at him, this is awkward -walks away-.

[Shaun]

if people want to, then fair enough. I really see no problem with not wanting to take part.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

I'm not the one being sensitive...

I'd find it flattering if the same person nominated me for every award...

I just don't think that members have strong enough skin to deal with knowing who's nominated them for these awards... despite it being just harmless.

I've gave my POV though.

Oh I didn't see Mockinator posted above me and you directed that at him, this is awkward -walks away-.

Just about to post.........

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

Just about to post.........

Ignore me...

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Brother Leon

non unanonymous

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

^^^ But I thought you said it's not being horrible, it's just light hearted?

Can't have it both ways.

And again, exactly what I'm trying to say. If its lighthearted and not meant maliciously then where is the problem in putting your name to it hmm?

Insults, and baiting (ie delib trying to upset someone you don't like) are against forum rules. So why is it allowed for this purpose?

People keep saying its fun. It mostly is. Mostly isn't good enough however.