[Marcus.]

he third instalment in the comedy franchise is to go in front of cameras in summer 2013 with director Ivan Reitman back at the helm, says Deadline.

As previously reported, Bill Murray is not expected to reprise his role as Peter Venkman.

"No, I can tell you he won't be involved," Dan Aykroyd said in August. "It's sad but we're passing it on to a new generation. Ghostbusters 3 can be a successful movie without Bill."

Etan Cohen (Tropic Thunder) is currently writing the script for Ghostbusters 3.

If the sequel goes into production in 2013 to make a 2014 release, its cinema debut will coincide with the 30th anniversary of the original Ghostbusters from 1984.

[Niamh.]

[Alf]

no thanks
cant any film makers come up with any origanal ideas these days?
ghostbusters without bill murray isn't ghostbusters

[Ramsay]

well thats a huge disappointment
i assume everyone else is back though?

[smeagol]

god knows how many more old stuff they are going to re do re invent and destroy

no bill murray means poor script

[lostalex]

He's a sad sack for not doing it. screw you Bill Murray! (i still love Groundhog Day though)

[Shaun]

nobody wants a third Ghostbusters movie

although Murray's done his fair share of turds (Garfield, Charlie's Angels)

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Shaun

nobody wants a third Ghostbusters movie

although Murray's done his fair share of turds (Garfield, Charlie's Angels)

I do. am i nobody? what an existentialist question.