Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-02-2013, 07:35 PM #1
lostalex's Avatar
lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
lostalex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
like queen victoria? she was longer in power than most people lived their entire lives? cleopatra? Boudica? Eva Peron?Hatshetshup, the eqyptian pharoah over 500 years ago? Tomyris the iranian queen 1500 years ago? catherine the great? joan of arc? Ghandi.....where have you been?

strange how you claim to care about women 100s of years ago, yet show no care for poor young men dying in trenches in coal mines of black water fever on foreignb fields or leprasy dying young, for the disabled, or for babies murdered in the womb? did you shed a tear for your forefathers who got bullets in their brain at the normandy landings when fighting the greatest tyranny the worlds ever seen for YOUR future and mind
you call babies leeches and care not at all that a million have been aborted in 6 years in the UK alone, often as a lifestyle choice....you have told everyone never to have any sympathy for any man, total 100% bitter hateful discrimination, but you go on to preach against discrimination when it suits you, total hypocrisy.

oh but you do claim to care more about words like murdered , more than you care for the actual action of murdering? incidentally how would you feel about parents deciding to abort because they believe the baby would be gay?
and all of those women you mentioned, were only allowed to be queens because there were no men that could take their place, in all of monarchy's heirarchy's, men were still above women, right?

In fact it was only last year(2012) that the british monarchy finally decided that women should be treated equal to men if the royal couple (wills and kate) have a daughter. right?
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak.

Last edited by lostalex; 21-02-2013 at 07:40 PM.
lostalex is offline  
Old 21-02-2013, 08:45 PM #2
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex View Post
and all of those women you mentioned, were only allowed to be queens because there were no men that could take their place, in all of monarchy's heirarchy's, men were still above women, right?

In fact it was only last year(2012) that the british monarchy finally decided that women should be treated equal to men if the royal couple (wills and kate) have a daughter. right?
thats the monarchys fault not men....again its a battle between rich and poor.
the truth is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
abortion or assisted, death


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts