[Livia]

Originally Posted by Lee.

If "mike" had duped a young girl on here and persuaded her to go meet him in London everybody would be up in arms, "mollie" would not be constantly glorified and she'd have been banned, but because it was just poor old Locke, it seems to be perfectly acceptable?

It doesn't wash we'll with me at all, and I think her being voted for in this is completely out of order

Completely agree. I've been shocked at the tolerance that has been shown about the whole Mollie/StupidHoe thing. It is a bannable offence on here to save someone else's picture that they freely posted on a public forum, but it's okay to post someone else's picture, without their permission, and to pretend that it's you? I can't say **** on this forum, but it's okay to lead people along with a string of lies, and this has to be met with kindness and understanding? Gimme a break.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

If "mike" had duped a young girl on here and persuaded her to go meet him in London everybody would be up in arms, "mollie" would not be constantly glorified and she'd have been banned, but because it was just poor old Locke, it seems to be perfectly acceptable?

It doesn't wash we'll with me at all, and I think her being voted for in this is completely out of order

Originally Posted by Livia

Completely agree. I've been shocked at the tolerance that has been shown about the whole Mollie/StupidHoe thing. It is a bannable offence on here to save someone else's picture that they freely posted on a public forum, but it's okay to post someone else's picture, without their permission, and to pretend that it's you? I can't say **** on this forum, but it's okay to lead people along with a string of lies, and this has to be met with kindness and understanding? Gimme a break.

I agree with both of these.

Mike is lucky it was admin that decided what happened to be honest. Not that it matters anyway since I doubt he will be back anytime soon.