[arista]

Originally Posted by lostalex

The EU should create it's own defense force, so they stop relying on the US. we all know the French and British have been pressuring America to get involved for MONTHS now.

Not this is Small Arms
from USA
its the President Alone doing it

[arista]

PM Cameron and Russian Leader Putin
Live on News Ch's.

Putin just said he said the blood is on both sides
and the one that eats their organs - why supply him?

(thats the rebal leader who cut the heart out of one he killed)



Very Valid Putin

[Tom4784]

The problem with these rebellions is that they often swap one dictator for another. I don't think we should be favouring any side.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

The problem with these rebellions is that they often swap one dictator for another. I don't think we should be favouring any side.

Yes we in The UK get MP's to Vote No to that.



So Let American Stupid give Small Arms to Rebals

And Russia to carry on giving better arms & Air Support
to the President of Syria.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes millions Agree



And America only came Late to Europe after Japan
woke you feckers up.

Late to Europe? It wasn't our war. We shouldn't have had to get involved at all. It was your problem you should have solved it yourselves.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by arista

PM Cameron and Russian Leader Putin
Live on News Ch's.

Putin just said he said the blood is on both sides
and the one that eats their organs - why supply him?

(thats the rebal leader who cut the heart out of one he killed)



Very Valid Putin

cause using chemical weapons on children is any less vile than cutting someone's chest open? not really.

[arista]

Originally Posted by lostalex

cause using chemical weapons on children is any less vile than cutting someone's chest open? not really.

But Rebals have used it as well
Fact

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by arista

But Rebals have used it as well
Fact

my point is both sides are as vile as each other, but Putin is only selling weapons to 1 side, so he's a hypocrite. He has no right to sell weapons to the syrian government and then criticize the the US if we give weapons to the rebels.

Obviously i'm against arming any of these evil fookers. I think we should stay as far away from the entire thing as possible and let the UN sort it out. But the arms industry is large. Both the US and Russia make billions of dollars a year selling weapons.

[arista]

" Putin is only selling weapons to 1 side"


Yes the President of Syria
thats his choice.



Better than 5 or 6 rebal groups
that end up killing Americans , French and British

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by arista

" Putin is only selling weapons to 1 side"


Yes the President of Syria
thats his choice.



Better than 5 or 6 rebal groups
that end up killing Americans , French and British

OIC, it's fine if Russia's weapons are used to kill people fighting against a tyrannical dictatorship, but heaven forbid any americans or brits get killed.

What would you do if Assad was YOUR president Arista? would you fight him? or would you stay a silent slave? And how would you feel about Russia arming him?

[billy123]

These are the people obama aka America wants to give weapons to make your own mind up.

WARNING THIS LINK SHOWS SYRIAN REBELS THAT OBAMA SUPPORTS AND SHOWS THE PEOPLE HE LIKES EXECUTING PEOPLE DO NOT CLICK UNLESS YOU LIKE OBAMA.
http://www.syriantube.net/5047.html