[jet]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Dan interfered in a discussion(at the time it was not an argument) with Jemima & Charlie, Dan made it into an argument. He stated when talking to Hazel he will say something when he doesnt agree with something. On that, what is the difference of Joe saying something when he didnt like what Dan was saying?

But Joe didn't just disagree, did he? He went off on Dan in a way that was out of all proportion.
But as joeysteele says, what the point of even posting in Dan's defense. To many people, the fact he exists at all is a problem. It's a wonder he hasn't been criticized for just breathing yet.
Have at it. (Not you specifically Ellen, I'm talking in general by the way.)