[Ellen]

If she did cheat, BB should void her noms & she should be put up but i highly doubt BB will do anything.

[barbel13]

An investigation is on going.Scotland yard is involved and the SAS ready for any call up to the BB HOUSE.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by Ellen

If she did cheat, BB should void her noms & she should be put up but i highly doubt BB will do anything.

She had three names written down,then crossed one of them out.

[sampvt]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

I think Charlie cheated as well. She was dithering and rewriting and only went for it when Gina told her to just nominate her.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

The stench of desperation to get Gina up is palpable.

I'm not buying that you have insider knowledge either.

[joeysteele]

Oh for me, Gina should be punished and/or up too, she told Charlie who was really being pathetic totally, just to vote for her.
That is blatant influencing of nominations too and she should have kept her mouth shut while anyone elses nominations were taking place.

Again,I doubt anything will done as to Gina.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I think the lines haven't been open yet, because Big Brother is deciding what to do about the rule break. I noticed Charlie was cheating as well. She was dithering and rewriting. She only wrote Gina after she told her to just nominate her.

[karezza]

If they are all up then Sophie or Gina would be evicted.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by karezza

If they are all up then Sophie or Gina would be evicted.

Those face to face noms were a complete farce. Lots of cheating going on. I think BB is deciding what to do.

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I think the lines haven't been open yet, because Big Brother is deciding what to do about the rule break. I noticed Charlie was cheating as well. She was dithering and rewriting. She only wrote Gina after she told her to just nominate her.

They won't open the lines until they can announce it, so it will be on tonight's show.
BB. Must have already decided what they are doing otherwise the bookies would not have opened the book so as to speak.

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

If Gina has cheated didnt she nom Charlie? So that would mean Charlie only received one nom if Gina's are void?

Void nominations means no nominations and according to BB rules if no nomiation is made the said HM will go up.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by Ellen

If Gina has cheated didnt she nom Charlie? So that would mean Charlie only received one nom if Gina's are void?

Void nominations means no nominations and according to BB rules if no nomiation is made the said HM will go up.

No idea, but i think Sophie, Charlie and Gina have all cheated. Sophie had three names down, but crossed on out. Charlie was rewriting and Gina influenced Charlie nominations.

[HBB1508]

I really wish they would just put the whole house up and be done with it now.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by HBB1508

I really wish they would just put the whole house up and be done with it now.

We'll have to wait and see what they decide to do.

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

No idea, but i think Sophie, Charlie and Gina have all cheated. Sophie had three names down, but crossed on out. Charlie was rewriting and Gina influenced Charlie nominations.

Crikey all three of them!!! Just shows that face to face noms is a farce, BB seem to be taking their time in saying what is going on, cant take that much time going through the footage.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Crikey all three of them!!! Just shows that face to face noms is a farce, BB seem to be taking their time in saying what is going on, cant take that much time going through the footage.

I'm not sure they will punish all three. Maybe just Sophie? Her rule break was really obvious.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by MrWong

The stench of desperation to get Gina up is palpable.

I'm not buying that you have insider knowledge either.

You never miss a chance to have a dig at me. Why don't you just ignore me son, your level of vitriol towards people is disturbing and you should be banned, you are little more than ????????????????????? that takes pleasure in winding posters up so they get banned for arguing with you. I have bitten my tongue so often but if there are mods reading this, can he be warned for this as its a day in day out event.

If you don't like me as you say you don't and want me to ignore you, why do you constantly poke fun at my posts. I proved last year that my contact was true and I see no reason to vindicate myself to you. I reported the truth and I was right so how you can poke fun at me is pathetic. She was told one thing and only part of that thing was implemented as the other part of that report was deemed as academic. The fact that I brought it up in the first place was enough to prove truth. so please bog off and get a life son.

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I'm not sure they will punish all three. Maybe just Sophie? Her rule break was really obvious.

Blatantly obvious with 3 names, she is a silly girl

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

You never miss a chance to have a dig at me. Why don't you just ignore me son, your level of vitriol towards people is disturbing and you should be banned, you are little more than ????????????????????? that takes pleasure in winding posters up so they get banned for arguing with you. I have bitten my tongue so often but if there are mods reading this, can he be warned for this as its a day in day out event.

If you don't like me as you say you don't and want me to ignore you, why do you constantly poke fun at my posts. I proved last year that my contact was true and I see no reason to vindicate myself to you. I reported the truth and I was right so how you can poke fun at me is pathetic. She was told one thing and only part of that thing was implemented as the other part of that report was deemed as academic. The fact that I brought it up in the first place was enough to prove truth. so please bog off and get a life son.

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.

How do you know that?

We only got to see Twins, Sam and Gina's board. They were the only ones who actually turned their board around like they were supposed to!

As far as I could see (which wasn't much) Charlie only ever wrote one name down and that was Jack & Joe.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

How do you know that?

We only got to see Twins, Sam and Gina's board. They were the only ones who actually turned their board around like they were supposed to!

As far as I could see (which wasn't much) Charlie only ever wrote one name down and that was Jack & Joe.

I've added a link of last nights show to one of the many threads whining about it.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.

As usual you are talking ****. The show was recorded and it shows clearly gina messing with her board throughout the noms process and she even verbally altered the result by telling Charlie to nem her, or are you totally hell bent on refusing to see anything bad she does, its called extreme denial syndrome or in your case wong gets it wrong and spells it wong.

You need to stop lambasting people with stupid one liner pokes as its not doing you any good son. Stick to slagging of celebs and the like, they don't care.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

As usual you are talking ****. The show was recorded and it shows clearly gina messing with her board throughout the noms process and she even verbally altered the result by telling Charlie to nem her, or are you totally hell bent on refusing to see anything bad she does, its called extreme denial syndrome or in your case wong gets it wrong and spells it wong.

You need to stop lambasting people with stupid one liner pokes as its not doing you any good son. Stick to slagging of celebs and the like, they don't care.

Not true.

Here's the link to last nights show -

[Livia]

Ahhh whatever. The comforting thing is that only the die-hards are still backing Gina. She's lost so much popularity over her questionable behaviour that there's no way she'll win now. I have more chance of winning that Gina does.